Izzybabby

Izzybabby — CS2 Stats

76561198979856638[U:1:1019590910]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

844Tracked matches69%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 Solid
Premier CS Rating21,173Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14569 of 44789 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIzzybabbyPREMIER21,173 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning38
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateWLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression2.9
Utility6.1
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 691ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning3.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time691ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 7–0
130Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2114767%0.01
nukeA1811761%-0.00
ancientB158753%0.01
mirageA127558%-0.01
infernoA117464%0.04
anubisD92722%-0.05
cacheS86275%-0.00
train330100%0.04
vertigo110100%-0.07
boulder1010%0.01
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

358Matches
48%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10852%0.8713.8
Dust25742%0.8813.2
Inferno5538%0.7612.2
Ancient4757%0.9614.3
Nuke3256%0.8914.4
Anubis2846%1.1014.1
Vertigo825%0.8013.3
Cache825%0.7816.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
691msReaction time
16.8%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
10.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.7872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–8-0.0421%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0842%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0239%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.069%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0122%22 Aug
anubis7–130.0010%22 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%21 Aug
train13–60.0522%21 Aug
nuke13–40.0514%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0413%19 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0116%19 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0513%19 Aug
dust28–130.0822%10 Aug
dust215–150.0617%10 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0219%8 Aug
dust213–40.0214%8 Aug
anubis13–10-0.110%8 Aug
cache13–8-0.0619%8 Aug
cache13–90.1014%8 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0717%8 Aug
inferno13–00.0240%8 Aug
cache13–10-0.0117%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0312%7 Aug
boulder11–130.0115%30 Jul
train13–80.0227%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0019%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0327%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0133%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0424%22 Jul
inferno13–7-0.039%22 Jul
mirage13–1-0.059%22 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0115%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0124%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0643%21 Jul
cache5–00.0525%21 Jul
ancient10–20.0818%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0221%21 Jul
cache4–13-0.0325%20 Jul
dust23–13-0.0525%18 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0922%18 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0015%18 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0710%17 Jul
dust213–20.0331%16 Jul
ancient9–10.0117%16 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0511%9 Jul
dust213–110.0414%17 Jun
dust215–15-0.0320%9 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0512%8 Jun
dust213–60.0117%4 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0313%3 Jun
dust213–6-0.0119%2 Jun
ancient0–9-0.0613%2 Jun
ancient16–120.0622%2 Jun
ancient13–70.0921%2 Jun
cache8–13-0.0215%2 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0226%1 Jun
nuke9–130.019%1 Jun
inferno13–70.0125%31 May
ancient10–13-0.0025%31 May
mirage11–130.0736%31 May
dust213–100.1030%31 May
dust213–60.0428%31 May
dust213–10.0331%31 May
inferno7–130.0624%30 May
dust27–130.0117%30 May
dust213–10-0.0416%29 May
dust213–11-0.0518%29 May
anubis11–13-0.087%29 May
nuke10–20.0546%29 May
inferno13–110.0926%29 May
inferno15–150.1315%27 May
nuke8–13-0.066%26 May
dust213–110.0122%26 May
inferno7–00.1831%26 May
mirage4–13-0.0811%26 May
mirage13–10.0030%26 May
anubis11–130.0515%25 May
dust26–13-0.0532%25 May
nuke9–130.0730%25 May
dust216–120.0229%25 May
dust210–20.0719%25 May
ancient9–13-0.049%25 May
overpass13–7-0.0016%25 May
inferno13–6-0.0522%25 May
inferno9–130.0852%24 May
nuke9–13-0.0216%24 May
ancient13–90.0521%24 May
ancient13–100.0427%24 May
ancient15–150.0325%24 May
nuke13–90.0826%24 May
nuke9–130.0121%23 May
anubis7–13-0.073%23 May
train13–30.0619%23 May
nuke13–110.0026%23 May
mirage13–80.0214%23 May
ancient6–13-0.0214%23 May
mirage14–160.0026%22 May
nuke13–11-0.027%22 May
anubis13–3-0.0724%20 May
mirage13–00.0336%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →