Boogie

Boogie — CS2 Stats

76561198979724460[U:1:1019458732]Steam profile ↗

587Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,000Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7582 of 17229 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoogieFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning40
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51445Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression3.7
Utility5.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time545ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 76% over 17dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1810856%0.00
cacheS1713476%0.01
ancientB179853%0.02
nukeC1661038%-0.02
dust2C145936%-0.00
infernoB126650%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.01
overpass1010%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

92Matches
54%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
66.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1100%1.0016.0
Dust21100%0.8113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
532msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
7.83HE damage / grenade
7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1744% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0314%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0328%25 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0312%25 Aug
inferno14–160.0115%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0327%23 Aug
dust26–130.0123%23 Aug
dust213–50.0440%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0423%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0814%22 Aug
nuke1–12-0.0543%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0215%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0021%20 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0320%19 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0126%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0150%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0234%15 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0225%13 Aug
ancient13–100.0315%13 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0420%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0525%6 Aug
cache13–11-0.0126%6 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0710%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0531%5 Aug
cache13–90.0115%4 Aug
dust213–4-0.0011%3 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0920%3 Aug
cache6–13-0.0235%3 Aug
cache13–90.0336%3 Aug
dust24–00.1338%2 Aug
cache15–15-0.0612%2 Aug
dust215–15-0.069%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0211%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0013%1 Aug
nuke13–7-0.068%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0222%1 Aug
cache13–30.0332%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.0814%1 Aug
inferno13–10.0723%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0424%31 Jul
inferno15–150.0322%30 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0213%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0520%29 Jul
ancient9–130.0614%29 Jul
cache13–10.1019%28 Jul
dust213–20.0833%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0030%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0526%27 Jul
ancient13–30.1142%27 Jul
cache13–40.1728%26 Jul
cache9–130.0025%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.1114%22 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0519%22 Jul
cache13–9-0.0324%22 Jul
ancient13–110.0417%21 Jul
ancient6–130.0114%21 Jul
ancient13–60.0220%21 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0324%21 Jul
cache13–70.0226%20 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0221%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0815%20 Jul
cache13–80.1029%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0318%19 Jul
cache13–100.0317%19 Jul
mirage2–10-0.0520%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.0324%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0631%18 Jul
ancient13–10.0614%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0324%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0121%14 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0019%2 Jul
ancient5–130.0220%25 Jun
nuke13–50.0129%24 Jun
dust213–5-0.0127%23 Jun
nuke13–70.0220%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0917%23 Jun
inferno13–80.0215%20 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0918%18 Jun
mirage13–60.0326%18 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0316%17 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0019%17 Jun
nuke15–150.0128%17 Jun
mirage13–90.1324%16 Jun
dust212–160.0120%14 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0432%12 Jun
nuke7–130.0628%11 Jun
dust28–130.0021%9 Jun
anubis13–90.0423%3 Jun
nuke16–120.0631%1 Jun
nuke11–130.0018%28 May
nuke7–13-0.1028%27 May
mirage8–130.0220%27 May
overpass3–130.1129%25 May
ancient13–70.0519%24 May
ancient11–130.0514%24 May
inferno12–160.0025%22 May
inferno13–40.1015%20 May
inferno16–13-0.0125%20 May
mirage13–60.0221%20 May
mirage5–130.0424%19 May
nuke13–30.0123%17 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →