phantom

phantom — CS2 Stats

US76561198975505177[U:1:1015239449]Steam profile ↗

895Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,203Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13105 of 25509 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGphantomFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,203 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46468Last 10046%Win rateWLWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.2
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 11–2
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB178947%0.00
dust2C1661038%0.01
nukeS1410471%0.04
mirageD1431121%0.01
infernoD93633%0.02
overpassS96367%-0.01
cacheA95456%0.05
anubis42250%-0.01
train32167%-0.00
vertigo2020%-0.04
sanctum1010%0.02
rooftop1010%-0.07
jura110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

263Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
75.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2148%1.2013.4
Inferno1436%1.0617.6
Ancient1258%1.2815.2
Dust21267%1.3419.1
Anubis1050%1.0613.2
Vertigo850%1.0616.0
Nuke838%1.4614.0
Train250%1.0114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
576msReaction time
26.7%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
16.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6869% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.028%24 May
dust28–130.0714%24 May
nuke13–90.0718%24 May
inferno9–13-0.049%22 May
nuke13–60.1018%22 May
ancient9–13-0.0119%21 May
mirage11–13-0.1020%21 May
anubis13–110.0115%21 May
dust213–11-0.0114%21 May
mirage11–13-0.0320%20 May
inferno15–15-0.0215%20 May
overpass13–20.0614%20 May
nuke13–80.0313%19 May
inferno13–10-0.059%12 May
ancient8–13-0.0120%12 May
overpass1–13-0.0910%12 May
inferno13–80.0616%12 May
ancient10–130.0914%12 May
dust26–13-0.0613%12 May
ancient11–13-0.048%11 May
dust215–15-0.0118%11 May
mirage11–13-0.0127%11 May
dust213–110.0314%11 May
dust28–13-0.0116%7 May
dust215–150.0233%6 May
dust213–10.1311%6 May
nuke13–90.0414%6 May
dust28–13-0.0713%6 May
cache13–30.1931%5 May
nuke13–70.0617%5 May
cache12–120.0721%5 May
anubis13–20.018%5 May
nuke13–9-0.0214%5 May
ancient13–10-0.042%5 May
cache6–13-0.0112%4 May
sanctum5–90.0217%4 May
ancient13–50.099%4 May
nuke9–13-0.038%4 May
anubis5–13-0.079%4 May
mirage7–130.0015%3 May
ancient13–50.045%3 May
nuke13–9-0.039%3 May
dust210–130.0215%3 May
overpass16–120.0318%3 May
cache9–130.0010%3 May
inferno15–15-0.0110%2 May
ancient2–6-0.038%2 May
overpass9–130.0414%2 May
cache13–40.1016%2 May
cache13–20.0215%30 Apr
cache13–60.0424%30 Apr
ancient5–130.0111%29 Apr
nuke13–60.1019%29 Apr
cache2–13-0.0733%29 Apr
cache13–50.1313%29 Apr
overpass13–5-0.056%28 Apr
anubis8–130.0314%26 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0425%18 Dec
mirage10–13-0.019%18 Dec
mirage10–130.1311%15 Dec
inferno8–80.1820%15 Dec
rooftop6–9-0.0713%15 Dec
inferno9–70.078%15 Dec
mirage11–130.1522%6 Dec
vertigo0–13-0.0814%6 Dec
nuke11–20.2260%6 Dec
vertigo6–90.0029%18 Aug
train16–140.0019%6 Aug
inferno15–19-0.0314%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0022%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.008%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0321%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0110%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0225%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0412%5 Aug
mirage13–40.028%4 Aug
jura13–90.0712%31 Jul
dust27–13-0.0022%31 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0110%30 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0317%30 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0917%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0317%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.093%30 Jul
train9–13-0.0110%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0614%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0212%29 Jul
ancient7–20.0528%29 Jul
overpass16–130.0517%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0014%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0616%28 Jul
dust213–70.034%28 Jul
nuke13–20.0816%28 Jul
mirage9–130.0119%28 Jul
mirage13–30.007%28 Jul
overpass13–6-0.0535%28 Jul
dust213–50.0110%28 Jul
train13–40.008%28 Jul
overpass13–90.005%27 Jul
inferno15–15-0.027%27 Jul
dust213–60.0114%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →