˜”*°• Champ ˜”*°˜” — CS2 Stats

76561198969235194[U:1:1008969466]

3,417Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,841Pink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4340 of 10633 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,025 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG˜”*°• Champ ˜”*°˜”FACEITLevel 4 · 1,025 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,841 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning42
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43525Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.5
Utility4.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time637ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–8
132Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.01
infernoD1961332%-0.03
dust2D1751229%-0.01
cacheC167944%-0.00
ancientB136746%-0.02
anubisS75271%-0.02
nukeD62433%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,232Matches
47%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
68.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage39448%0.8312.9
Dust219539%0.8413.2
Anubis17445%0.8213.8
Ancient16449%0.8514.4
Inferno14948%0.8514.0
Nuke6954%0.9415.3
Train4349%0.8314.1
Overpass2454%0.8012.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
634msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.49HE damage / grenade
4.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8414% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0430%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0723%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0220%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.029%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0417%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0025%20 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0413%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0731%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0817%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0231%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0011%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0311%15 Aug
mirage16–130.0618%15 Aug
cache10–130.0423%15 Aug
anubis16–140.0519%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0317%15 Aug
dust213–9-0.0215%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0020%14 Aug
dust216–120.0420%12 Aug
mirage6–130.0024%10 Aug
ancient15–15-0.059%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0023%10 Aug
mirage13–100.0220%10 Aug
cache4–13-0.0617%10 Aug
cache13–20.0530%8 Aug
cache16–120.0415%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0120%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0230%6 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0615%6 Aug
mirage13–50.0719%6 Aug
dust28–130.0521%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0412%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0119%5 Aug
mirage5–00.1025%5 Aug
dust216–140.0726%5 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0324%4 Aug
cache9–130.0020%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0625%2 Aug
dust213–80.1333%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0814%2 Aug
dust26–130.0023%1 Aug
cache13–90.0224%1 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0211%1 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0820%1 Aug
dust216–130.0127%30 Jul
cache15–15-0.0416%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0227%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0217%25 Jul
cache5–130.0319%24 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0215%24 Jul
nuke2–130.0138%22 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0219%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0527%20 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0527%20 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0316%19 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0429%19 Jul
cache9–13-0.0620%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.019%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0010%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0344%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0228%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0018%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0130%16 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0512%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0527%15 Jul
anubis10–13-0.058%15 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0013%13 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0116%13 Jul
mirage15–150.0112%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0021%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0214%13 Jul
mirage5–130.0327%12 Jul
anubis13–50.0128%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.077%12 Jul
nuke6–130.0319%12 Jul
dust215–15-0.0016%12 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0317%12 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0521%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0619%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0716%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0516%11 Jul
cache13–100.0221%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0328%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0635%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0514%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0122%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0116%9 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0122%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0318%9 Jul
cache13–100.0121%9 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0419%2 Jul
inferno5–130.0023%2 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0327%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0817%30 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0139%30 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0415%30 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0315%29 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0320%29 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0016%29 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0036%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →