Adel^ — CS2 Stats

AT76561198968626613[U:1:1008360885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,623Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,819Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6313 of 33023 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,919 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning34

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression2.6

Utility5.5

Positioning3.4

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning3.4

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time516ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy16.6%+3.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 11–13

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 44% over 34

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	34	15–19	44%	-0.02
inferno	A	23	14–9	61%	-0.02
anubis	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.03
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.02
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

740Matches

51%Win rate

0.70Avg K/D

69.4ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	105	57%	0.89	12.7
Ancient	57	54%	0.90	12.3
Inferno	46	54%	0.88	12.8
Dust2	39	49%	0.90	12.1
Anubis	35	57%	0.82	11.5
Vertigo	19	42%	0.80	13.4
Overpass	11	36%	0.78	12.1
Nuke	5	80%	1.18	19.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

77.9%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

510msReaction time

14.6%T opening success

40.2%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

8.07HE damage / grenade

8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 14.6202% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	-0.05	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	7%	26 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	29%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	10%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	19%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	10%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	11%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–0	0.02	15%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	3%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	28%	16 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.00	29%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	28%	16 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	27%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	10%	16 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	39%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	40%	16 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.09	16%	15 Aug →
train	9–13	-0.04	0%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	7%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	11%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	24%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	18%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	3%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.08	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	5%	13 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.00	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	9%	10 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	15%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	24%	8 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.07	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.11	18%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	32%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.04	17%	7 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	34%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	20%	7 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.08	38%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	35%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	29%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.09	31%	7 Aug →
inferno	0–2	-0.06	0%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	10%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	0%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	24%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	23%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	32%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	4%	1 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	8%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	22%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	5–0	-0.02	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	6%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	7%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	27%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.05	25%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	13%	31 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	7%	30 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	15%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	-0.04	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	21%	29 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.00	18%	29 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.05	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	11%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	12%	28 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	10%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	4%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	6%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	11%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	17%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.08	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	3%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	9%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	14%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	6%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	14%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	9%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	17%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	17%	24 Jul →