50 AE — CS2 Stats

76561198958471494[U:1:998205766]

3,401Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,299Blue band · top ~32.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19680 of 30439 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,114 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG50 AEFACEITLevel 4 · 1,114 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,299 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning41
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD375310Last 10037%Win rateLLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression5.6
Utility4.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 687ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time664ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 30.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — poseidon 9–4
130Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 44% over 32anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C32141844%-0.03
mirageC27121544%0.00
cacheC94544%0.02
anubisD91811%-0.02
infernoD61517%-0.03
ancientD51420%-0.02
nuke41325%-0.02
overpass21150%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.05
office2020%0.01
poseidon110100%0.20
train110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

497Matches
51%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
86.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9657%1.3217.7
Dust24961%1.4618.0
Nuke3355%1.3217.4
Inferno3339%0.9313.4
Ancient3037%1.0615.6
Anubis2236%1.1816.2
Overpass1450%1.0916.5
Vertigo862%1.4115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
89.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
687msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
11.90HE damage / grenade
11.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2987% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0725%25 Aug
cache3–130.0327%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0531%16 Aug
dust21–13-0.030%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0431%16 Aug
dust212–160.0339%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0026%18 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0232%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0421%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0320%14 Jul
cache13–80.0136%14 Jul
cache5–13-0.0239%14 Jul
cache13–8-0.0324%13 Jul
cache9–130.0133%13 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0217%13 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0419%13 Jul
dust22–13-0.0818%13 Jul
cache10–13-0.0326%13 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0821%12 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0129%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0415%12 Jul
anubis3–13-0.1114%12 Jul
dust21–13-0.0624%12 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0519%12 Jul
cache13–60.0343%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0437%12 Jul
mirage3–13-0.030%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0038%12 Jul
dust214–16-0.0437%11 Jul
mirage9–130.0225%11 Jul
dust216–140.0523%10 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0425%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0422%4 Jul
dust215–15-0.1225%2 Jul
dust22–7-0.190%1 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0441%1 Jul
inferno4–90.0121%28 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0727%25 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0323%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0114%25 Jun
anubis4–130.0337%25 Jun
mirage13–110.0216%25 Jun
dust213–9-0.0325%25 Jun
dust213–6-0.0123%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0810%25 Jun
overpass13–20.0215%25 Jun
anubis9–130.0212%25 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0731%25 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0316%25 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0225%25 Jun
dust213–100.0114%25 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0146%24 Jun
mirage12–120.0226%24 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0636%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0239%24 Jun
dust213–9-0.048%24 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0026%24 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0620%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0322%24 Jun
mirage13–90.0633%23 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0010%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0232%23 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0529%23 Jun
dust213–8-0.0425%22 Jun
poseidon9–40.2024%22 Jun
cache13–80.1532%22 Jun
mirage6–130.0449%22 Jun
dust213–60.0624%22 Jun
dust26–13-0.0826%22 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0235%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0730%22 Jun
dust213–40.0552%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0135%21 Jun
dust25–13-0.0457%21 Jun
dust212–12-0.0230%21 Jun
dust212–120.0126%20 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0033%20 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0031%20 Jun
mirage13–70.0729%20 Jun
dust213–5-0.0218%20 Jun
mirage13–80.1720%20 Jun
anubis3–130.0255%20 Jun
dust213–50.0517%20 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.0924%20 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0733%20 Jun
dust213–11-0.0125%20 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0124%20 Jun
train13–00.0714%19 Jun
office12–120.0327%19 Jun
dust27–13-0.18100%19 Jun
dust213–60.0413%19 Jun
office11–13-0.0134%16 Jun
dust212–12-0.0117%16 Jun
dust213–10-0.0438%15 Jun
dust211–130.0525%15 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0123%15 Jun
dust213–6-0.104%15 Jun
mirage12–120.0122%15 Jun
mirage6–130.0428%15 Jun
cache3–13-0.0024%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →