Mammon

Mammon — CS2 Stats

76561198957831989[U:1:997566261]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,742Tracked matches33%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,233Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24564 of 51455 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,059 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMammonFACEITLevel 9 · 2,059 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,233 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning45
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateWLLLTLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression4.8
Utility2.7
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.5
Utility2.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time568ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 24cacheWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.00
mirageB23111248%-0.01
ancientB157847%0.01
anubisC156940%0.00
infernoC94544%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.01
nukeB63350%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,169Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust234053%0.9915.5
Mirage27149%0.9415.0
Ancient22351%1.0115.3
Anubis13253%1.0514.7
Inferno8238%0.7412.5
Nuke7342%0.9314.0
Overpass3444%0.9014.5
Train1060%1.1216.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
560msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
9.33HE damage / grenade
2.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3085 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4895% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.1325%30 Aug
mirage2–7-0.0610%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0223%27 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0426%26 Aug
inferno8–80.0723%25 Aug
anubis9–130.0327%24 Aug
dust216–19-0.0213%23 Aug
mirage16–140.0523%23 Aug
inferno12–160.0121%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0225%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0116%23 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0815%22 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0319%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0018%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0715%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0423%9 Aug
mirage13–110.0112%9 Aug
anubis12–16-0.049%9 Aug
dust24–130.0424%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0440%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0520%8 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0011%7 Aug
anubis13–90.0427%7 Aug
dust216–140.0326%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0620%7 Aug
ancient9–130.0021%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.007%7 Aug
ancient9–130.0517%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0122%7 Aug
cache12–16-0.0123%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0116%6 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0328%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.049%5 Aug
ancient13–40.0215%5 Aug
dust213–40.0518%5 Aug
cache13–40.0417%5 Aug
ancient6–8-0.0122%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0421%5 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0717%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0013%4 Aug
dust213–80.0226%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0030%4 Aug
dust213–2-0.0123%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0016%3 Aug
anubis13–80.0412%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0622%3 Aug
anubis9–130.0321%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0417%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0228%3 Aug
dust213–20.0811%3 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0413%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0819%2 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0630%31 Jul
anubis16–130.0312%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0212%31 Jul
nuke13–50.0419%31 Jul
dust22–13-0.100%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0014%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0418%31 Jul
inferno13–30.0221%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0612%31 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0611%30 Jul
anubis10–130.0612%29 Jul
inferno10–13-0.129%29 Jul
dust213–40.0426%29 Jul
cache0–13-0.050%29 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0626%27 Jul
dust214–160.0126%27 Jul
mirage15–150.0615%26 Jul
anubis11–130.0517%25 Jul
dust213–110.0019%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0312%22 Jul
dust23–13-0.1223%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0018%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0316%21 Jul
nuke16–120.0224%21 Jul
anubis13–50.0521%21 Jul
dust213–60.0521%21 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0710%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0219%20 Jul
dust211–130.0328%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0123%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.0330%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0421%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0021%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0211%18 Jul
dust213–90.0812%18 Jul
dust213–80.0716%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0612%17 Jul
cache13–110.0419%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0210%17 Jul
cache13–4-0.0012%17 Jul
ancient13–90.0522%16 Jul
dust213–110.0217%15 Jul
cache11–13-0.0628%12 Jul
dust213–8-0.0011%12 Jul
nuke4–130.0513%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0512%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0316%12 Jul
inferno13–100.0822%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →