m o g

m o g — CS2 Stats

76561198945132970[U:1:984867242]Steam profile ↗

1,062Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,898Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20265 of 51028 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,681 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm o gFACEITLevel 8 · 1,681 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,898 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning63
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateLWLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression8.9
Utility6.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 73% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 73% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time589ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — poseidon 7–9
131Biggest win — anubis
3Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2491538%0.02
nukeB189950%0.01
anubisB136746%0.01
ancientA127558%-0.00
infernoD112918%0.00
mirageB105550%-0.01
cache42250%-0.04
poseidon43175%0.10
overpass21150%-0.06
boulder1010%-0.04
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

583Matches
50%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
86.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust213952%1.3017.3
Ancient9449%1.3418.0
Mirage8637%1.1217.3
Inferno7451%1.2418.2
Nuke7061%1.2417.7
Anubis6942%1.2217.8
Train2176%1.7617.9
Cache1656%1.1114.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
590msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
73.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
12.09HE damage / grenade
8.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8609% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0118%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0316%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0521%29 Aug
anubis13–110.0418%28 Aug
boulder1–13-0.0427%27 Aug
inferno16–120.0620%24 Aug
dust25–130.0329%24 Aug
dust213–70.0620%23 Aug
dust213–60.1017%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.0820%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0126%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0125%19 Aug
anubis8–130.0433%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0524%18 Aug
ancient13–60.0127%18 Aug
cache13–11-0.0052%18 Aug
inferno13–110.0113%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0510%17 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0028%13 Aug
cache6–13-0.0829%11 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0415%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0215%4 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0513%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0326%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0127%2 Aug
anubis13–80.0419%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0121%1 Aug
nuke6–130.0223%1 Aug
nuke13–50.1118%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0023%29 Jul
dust213–100.0526%29 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0119%27 Jul
anubis16–120.0519%26 Jul
cache3–1-0.0817%26 Jul
ancient13–40.0727%26 Jul
ancient17–190.0123%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0224%25 Jul
dust213–90.0523%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0229%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0116%16 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0713%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.0129%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0123%12 Jul
anubis13–10.0523%12 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0038%11 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0226%11 Jul
dust26–130.1026%10 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0411%10 Jul
nuke10–2-0.0117%9 Jul
dust213–60.0425%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0118%9 Jul
dust213–10.0421%8 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0129%8 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0316%8 Jul
inferno10–130.0221%6 Jul
mirage13–100.0736%6 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0217%5 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0124%4 Jul
poseidon9–60.0445%4 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0418%4 Jul
inferno5–130.0237%4 Jul
dust24–130.0134%4 Jul
dust213–110.017%3 Jul
nuke13–70.0525%3 Jul
poseidon7–90.1725%3 Jul
poseidon9–30.1220%2 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0715%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0218%1 Jul
anubis11–130.0214%1 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0715%1 Jul
nuke13–60.0943%1 Jul
nuke13–60.0715%30 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0523%29 Jun
dust29–130.0418%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0526%24 Jun
dust213–100.0422%23 Jun
ancient1–10-0.0617%20 Jun
ancient13–60.0427%20 Jun
dust216–12-0.0216%20 Jun
dust210–130.0721%19 Jun
nuke9–130.0725%19 Jun
ancient13–90.0015%19 Jun
dust27–130.0722%19 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0713%18 Jun
anubis13–90.0625%18 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0416%17 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0141%17 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0023%17 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0220%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0618%14 Jun
nuke13–10-0.038%14 Jun
dust26–130.0212%14 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.066%12 Jun
poseidon9–30.0824%12 Jun
nuke7–9-0.0716%12 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0123%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0419%12 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0624%11 Jun
dust28–13-0.0133%11 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0015%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →