Cocoa — CS2 Stats

76561198943967478[U:1:983701750]

218Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,042Purple band · top ~16.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12057 of 22895 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCocoaPREMIER18,042 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning41
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression3.8
Utility4.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time653ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29151452%-0.01
mirageC27121544%0.01
nukeD92722%0.00
ancientS86275%-0.00
cacheS75271%0.00
infernoD61517%-0.01
vertigo42250%0.01
train31233%-0.02
poseidon21150%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.00
anubis2020%-0.03
office110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
651msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
9.42HE damage / grenade
6.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7376% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0130%26 Aug
dust213–16-0.0320%26 Aug
dust24–130.0027%23 Aug
dust213–7-0.0227%18 Aug
poseidon9–20.0432%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0814%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0031%16 Aug
dust29–130.0536%16 Aug
nuke6–130.0122%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0923%15 Aug
overpass11–40.0138%14 Aug
mirage5–130.0221%14 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0130%13 Aug
mirage7–7-0.0319%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0018%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0125%12 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0518%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0418%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0529%9 Aug
vertigo13–90.0333%9 Aug
cache13–30.0226%9 Aug
train13–11-0.0231%9 Aug
office13–80.0422%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0226%9 Aug
mirage13–40.2332%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0115%9 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0026%8 Aug
cache13–60.0438%8 Aug
vertigo2–130.0223%6 Aug
cache4–13-0.0122%5 Aug
dust213–8-0.0119%5 Aug
ancient13–80.0115%5 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1110%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0111%4 Aug
mirage6–130.0743%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0613%4 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%4 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0210%4 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0011%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.0216%3 Aug
dust213–10.0423%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0828%2 Aug
ancient16–120.0012%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0312%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0215%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0513%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0421%2 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0318%2 Aug
dust213–100.0421%2 Aug
nuke6–130.1018%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0825%1 Aug
cache13–2-0.0512%1 Aug
dust213–50.0334%1 Aug
mirage13–00.0615%1 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.0924%31 Jul
ancient13–90.0222%30 Jul
nuke7–130.0519%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0424%28 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0028%28 Jul
dust210–130.0628%27 Jul
mirage16–130.0233%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0133%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0544%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0811%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0029%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0725%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0124%25 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0523%23 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0024%20 Jul
dust211–130.0225%20 Jul
cache13–60.0518%11 Jul
train12–12-0.0425%3 Mar
dust29–130.0029%2 Mar
mirage7–130.0029%28 Feb
dust24–13-0.0125%28 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0836%28 Feb
dust26–13-0.0127%26 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0032%24 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0721%24 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0228%20 Feb
dust213–11-0.0510%20 Feb
mirage5–130.0128%19 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0426%18 Feb
mirage13–110.0422%18 Feb
dust213–40.0314%17 Feb
dust213–70.0118%17 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0122%16 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0314%15 Feb
dust213–70.1330%14 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0124%14 Feb
mirage13–70.0422%14 Feb
mirage9–130.0619%13 Feb
train12–16-0.0019%12 Feb
vertigo3–13-0.0331%11 Feb
vertigo11–20.0241%11 Feb
dust213–10-0.0314%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0217%11 Feb
dust213–16-0.0116%11 Feb
mirage8–130.0121%11 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0118%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →