Jopp$tin — CS2 Stats

76561198932583891[U:1:972318163]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,720Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating15,388Purple band · top ~26.9% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning52

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateTLWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression7.1

Utility5.8

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning5.2

Utility5.8

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time564ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–8

13–2Biggest win — dust2

9Longest win streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 41% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	22	9–13	41%	-0.01
dust2	B	21	11–10	52%	0.00
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.03
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.01
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.02
inferno	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches

46%Win rate

0.77Avg K/D

63.9ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	7	43%	0.73	10.6
Dust2	6	67%	0.68	8.2
Overpass	3	67%	0.85	11.7
Ancient	3	67%	0.98	17.0
Inferno	2	0%	1.02	17.0
Cache	2	0%	0.73	11.5
Anubis	1	0%	0.29	4.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.4%Spray accuracy

68.7%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

550msReaction time

33.0%T opening success

51.2%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

9.64HE damage / grenade

8.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.9625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	12–12	0.05	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.05	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	5–0	-0.03	0%	9 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	30%	9 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.05	11%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.00	23%	8 Aug →
cache	2–4	-0.09	0%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	26%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	24%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	19%	24 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–5	-0.02	5%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	29%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	25%	23 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.04	20%	21 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.05	19%	21 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.02	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	12%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	18%	19 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.00	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	16%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	23%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.09	13%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	12%	19 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	33%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	25%	19 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	12%	18 Jul →
ancient	4–10	-0.05	0%	18 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.01	4%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	9%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	7%	18 Jul →
nuke	2–0	0.04	38%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	7%	18 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	12%	17 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	15%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	9%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.00	25%	17 Jul →
ancient	12–16	0.00	9%	17 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	8%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.00	15%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	4%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	10%	17 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	7%	16 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	14%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	24%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	9%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	8%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	15%	16 Jul →
dust2	7–2	-0.04	21%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	16%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.04	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	1–7	-0.07	0%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	29%	14 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.05	14%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	16%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	16%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	18%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	25%	13 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.11	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.08	29%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.11	17%	13 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–1	0.05	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	18%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	18%	13 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	33%	13 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.01	29%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.09	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.11	7%	12 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	12%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	33%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	19%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	7%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	7%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	4%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	12%	12 Jul →