cc shoe — CS2 Stats

76561198932337390[U:1:972071662]

1,043Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,018Blue band · top ~33.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14718 of 22135 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcc shoeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,018 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47494Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression3.7
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time581ms−140ms
first ⅓ avg 721ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 9–4
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 40% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC25101540%-0.03
dust2B22101245%-0.02
ancientC1771041%-0.03
nukeA169756%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.02
vertigo42250%-0.06
mirage43175%0.00
poseidon1010%-0.07
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
49%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
68.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21735%0.8813.4
Anubis1450%0.8911.6
Vertigo1369%1.0615.3
Mirage1242%0.8613.0
Ancient944%0.9712.2
Nuke560%0.779.0
Inferno450%1.0613.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
608msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
35.6%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.29HE damage / grenade
11.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.3916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.039%19 Jun
dust210–13-0.069%19 Jun
dust213–9-0.0122%19 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0116%19 Jun
dust216–12-0.0417%18 Jun
inferno13–10.0810%18 Jun
anubis13–11-0.017%18 Jun
inferno13–8-0.029%17 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0327%17 Jun
ancient13–70.0115%17 Jun
nuke13–8-0.039%17 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0426%17 Jun
dust213–90.0642%17 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0420%17 Jun
dust213–6-0.0220%17 Jun
inferno11–130.0642%17 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0327%16 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0418%16 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0212%14 Jun
inferno5–90.0410%14 Jun
inferno7–9-0.1128%13 Jun
ancient10–130.0130%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0331%13 Jun
dust29–13-0.0726%13 Jun
inferno4–9-0.167%13 Jun
anubis9–130.0430%13 Jun
dust22–130.0321%13 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0214%12 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2820%12 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0812%11 Jun
inferno9–70.0219%11 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0419%11 Jun
dust213–9-0.0217%10 Jun
dust213–50.0117%10 Jun
anubis13–11-0.029%7 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0918%6 Jun
inferno9–50.066%6 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0416%5 Jun
poseidon5–9-0.0721%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0211%3 Jun
inferno9–60.0716%3 Jun
vertigo9–3-0.1315%3 Jun
ancient13–50.0223%3 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0118%2 Jun
ancient8–13-0.037%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0317%31 May
nuke6–130.0527%31 May
inferno8–80.0522%31 May
ancient13–5-0.0418%30 May
nuke11–13-0.0122%30 May
inferno9–7-0.1110%30 May
anubis13–3-0.0318%30 May
ancient5–13-0.0120%30 May
inferno5–9-0.0823%30 May
inferno9–40.1132%30 May
inferno13–90.0138%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0326%15 Feb
nuke13–110.0122%31 Jan
inferno3–130.0017%31 Jan
vertigo2–13-0.070%31 Jan
inferno7–9-0.1217%31 Jan
dust23–13-0.0517%26 Jan
dust216–13-0.0225%5 Dec
inferno3–9-0.0724%4 Dec
ancient4–13-0.1126%4 Dec
mirage13–110.0117%3 Dec
nuke13–5-0.0220%3 Dec
dust213–100.0020%2 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0122%26 Nov
ancient11–130.0330%26 Nov
ancient13–5-0.1217%23 Nov
dust213–8-0.0414%23 Nov
dust20–4-0.040%23 Nov
vertigo9–7-0.0627%23 Nov
vertigo8–80.0115%22 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0225%22 Nov
inferno6–9-0.1219%22 Nov
inferno9–50.0417%22 Nov
nuke13–4-0.0331%20 Nov
nuke13–7-0.0519%20 Nov
dust213–5-0.0615%20 Nov
inferno13–11-0.0425%20 Nov
dust210–13-0.0024%15 Nov
anubis8–13-0.0739%15 Nov
dust28–130.0029%15 Nov
inferno14–16-0.0913%12 Nov
dust26–13-0.0528%9 Nov
dust211–13-0.049%8 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0020%8 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0141%8 Nov
inferno15–15-0.0319%8 Nov
ancient16–13-0.0533%8 Nov
dust24–13-0.0431%8 Nov
overpass13–10-0.037%8 Nov
nuke7–13-0.0218%8 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0133%8 Nov
mirage13–80.0347%4 Nov
nuke9–130.0128%3 Nov
ancient13–80.0324%3 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0733%3 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →