PashaHasan — CS2 Stats

76561198907642754[U:1:947377026]

2,980Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,169Purple band · top ~23.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3331 of 5420 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,269 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPashaHasanFACEITLevel 10 · 2,269 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER16,169 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning57
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5050Last 10050%Win rateLLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression7.7
Utility6.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.7
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time521ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — overpass 13–7
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.02
dust2B158753%0.00
anubisD1551033%0.02
infernoS129375%0.02
ancientC73443%0.02
vertigoA53260%0.04
trainC52340%-0.00
nuke41325%0.00
overpass42250%0.05
cache1010%0.00
warden110100%0.15
office1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,763Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage101251%1.1116.9
Dust257750%1.0616.6
Anubis45052%1.1317.2
Inferno40454%1.1417.1
Ancient32746%1.0616.7
Nuke12348%1.0617.1
Train9048%1.0516.0
Vertigo7946%1.0616.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
506msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
6.87HE damage / grenade
15.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.1329% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0629%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0024%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0839%21 Aug
dust213–30.0326%20 Aug
anubis20–220.0523%19 Aug
cache17–190.0022%18 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0812%15 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0519%31 Jul
anubis10–130.0228%30 Jul
anubis13–40.0825%28 Jul
mirage11–130.0543%23 Jul
inferno13–10.0121%22 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0615%8 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0324%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0118%22 Jun
dust219–17-0.0412%11 Jun
mirage10–130.0122%7 Jun
inferno13–70.1034%23 May
mirage13–8-0.0030%21 May
nuke14–160.0015%12 May
overpass5–13-0.0524%10 May
nuke9–130.0125%9 May
dust222–190.0023%26 Apr
inferno16–130.1131%17 Apr
dust211–130.0029%14 Apr
nuke13–50.0331%14 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0163%12 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0418%12 Apr
mirage22–180.0114%9 Apr
ancient11–130.0117%1 Apr
inferno13–50.0319%1 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0116%30 Mar
mirage13–50.0029%30 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0520%29 Mar
mirage13–40.1530%29 Mar
mirage13–20.1650%28 Mar
inferno3–130.0140%27 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0524%25 Mar
mirage13–80.036%25 Mar
vertigo5–13-0.0417%24 Mar
dust213–50.1025%24 Mar
inferno13–90.0516%23 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0514%22 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0614%22 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0222%22 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0516%22 Mar
mirage11–130.0523%21 Mar
dust24–13-0.0522%20 Mar
train4–13-0.080%19 Mar
dust22–13-0.0917%19 Mar
mirage13–90.1431%17 Mar
overpass13–70.1937%17 Mar
anubis13–70.0723%13 Mar
mirage13–70.1237%13 Mar
train6–130.0238%10 Mar
vertigo13–80.1216%10 Mar
mirage13–100.0113%8 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0426%8 Mar
mirage2–13-0.048%6 Mar
inferno13–80.019%27 Feb
train5–13-0.0635%27 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0210%25 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0225%23 Feb
mirage16–190.0421%23 Feb
overpass13–110.1123%22 Feb
anubis16–140.0921%22 Feb
mirage13–50.1040%20 Feb
train13–100.1236%20 Feb
anubis8–130.0126%20 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0517%17 Feb
anubis13–80.0344%16 Feb
dust27–13-0.0130%15 Feb
train13–10-0.0144%14 Feb
mirage13–10.0219%14 Feb
dust210–130.0323%11 Feb
vertigo13–90.0525%11 Feb
vertigo13–50.0627%11 Feb
ancient12–160.1143%10 Feb
dust213–10-0.0313%10 Feb
anubis13–30.1035%9 Feb
anubis3–130.0329%9 Feb
dust211–13-0.0025%9 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0314%7 Feb
dust213–30.0224%6 Feb
mirage11–130.0418%6 Feb
dust213–60.0331%30 Jan
warden13–40.1539%27 Jan
ancient13–90.0220%24 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0122%20 Jan
office10–130.0621%19 Jan
vertigo4–130.0435%19 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0317%18 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0323%15 Jan
inferno13–10.0433%14 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0322%12 Jan
dust219–170.0427%11 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0518%10 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0416%4 Jan
mirage10–130.0022%4 Jan
mirage13–80.0330%16 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →