ReNa — CS2 Stats

76561198885891430[U:1:925625702]

1,224Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,258Blue band · top ~42.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33760 of 49700 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 835 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReNaFACEITLevel 4 · 835 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,258 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning55
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47449Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression8.2
Utility5.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning5.5
Utility5.3
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time653ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — poseidon 9–3
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 20nukeWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2014670%0.01
infernoC1971237%-0.05
nukeD1861233%0.02
dust2B137654%0.03
anubisB115645%-0.00
cacheD62433%0.01
poseidonB63350%0.06
vertigo31233%-0.07
ancient21150%-0.03
debris1010%0.06
office110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches
49%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
69.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6048%0.8212.1
Dust23842%0.8312.6
Ancient1850%0.8513.9
Inferno1450%0.7912.9
Anubis757%0.8615.0
Nuke667%0.7111.8
Train4100%0.8311.3
Overpass250%0.6513.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
27.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
67.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
655msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4757% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0714%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0112%27 Aug
dust213–60.1717%27 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0316%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0728%27 Aug
cache8–13-0.0024%27 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1022%27 Aug
inferno9–5-0.0118%27 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0521%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0220%26 Aug
anubis13–50.0627%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0318%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0319%25 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0312%21 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0120%21 Aug
dust24–130.1025%21 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.2025%21 Aug
nuke9–70.0422%21 Aug
nuke9–10.1021%21 Aug
dust213–40.0316%21 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0926%20 Aug
anubis13–70.0219%20 Aug
mirage13–60.027%20 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0219%20 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0113%20 Aug
poseidon9–30.2228%20 Aug
inferno9–70.0317%17 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0813%17 Aug
inferno9–10.2219%17 Aug
nuke8–80.017%17 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0625%17 Aug
dust213–00.0317%12 Aug
anubis1–11-0.0021%12 Aug
anubis13–60.077%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0225%12 Aug
cache3–12-0.0318%12 Aug
mirage7–130.029%9 Aug
mirage13–110.0816%9 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0327%9 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0713%6 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0629%6 Aug
poseidon9–40.1321%6 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0550%6 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0322%5 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0516%5 Aug
inferno8–8-0.079%5 Aug
poseidon8–80.0128%5 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2738%5 Aug
nuke2–9-0.123%5 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0222%5 Aug
dust28–130.0326%5 Aug
dust213–160.0315%4 Aug
nuke13–80.0620%4 Aug
nuke11–130.0215%3 Aug
debris7–90.0610%3 Aug
nuke9–50.0520%3 Aug
inferno9–5-0.0611%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0613%2 Aug
dust213–100.0115%2 Aug
mirage13–50.1127%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0019%31 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0918%31 Jul
nuke6–90.0119%31 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0112%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0723%29 Jul
vertigo13–70.0013%29 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0114%29 Jul
nuke8–80.1114%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0121%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0317%26 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0219%26 Jul
nuke9–50.1614%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0417%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0127%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.056%25 Jul
dust213–60.0317%25 Jul
nuke9–50.1422%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0112%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0015%25 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0114%25 Jul
inferno9–40.0617%25 Jul
cache11–13-0.0110%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.0013%21 Jul
cache13–7-0.0017%21 Jul
inferno9–7-0.1017%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0316%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0623%17 Jul
inferno1–9-0.1221%16 Jul
mirage13–30.0629%16 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0313%16 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0015%14 Jul
nuke11–130.0320%14 Jul
dust213–110.0415%10 Jul
dust213–110.0324%10 Jul
cache13–50.0918%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.048%10 Jul
poseidon9–20.1717%10 Jul
office13–50.1015%10 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.1135%9 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0915%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →