Juice Goblin

Juice Goblin — CS2 Stats

US76561198879886968[U:1:919621240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

871Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,309Purple band · top ~23.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16144 of 27647 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 983 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJuice GoblinFACEITLevel 4 · 983 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,309 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning65
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47503Last 10047%Win rateWWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression8.7
Utility5.5
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time580ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–2
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30131743%0.03
nukeB23111248%0.02
cacheA127558%0.03
infernoB115645%0.02
anubisB84450%0.03
ancientD62433%-0.02
mirageD51420%-0.02
trainS54180%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
41%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
67.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%1.4611.0
Dust2333%0.9013.3
Nuke333%1.0215.0
Ancient2100%1.6512.5
Inferno250%0.8910.5
Overpass1100%2.0016.0
Anubis10%0.385.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
589msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
8.00HE damage / grenade
8.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2932% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.1032%28 Aug
nuke13–20.0314%24 Aug
dust27–130.119%24 Aug
nuke13–50.1321%23 Aug
dust25–130.0422%23 Aug
dust24–130.0528%21 Aug
nuke7–130.0627%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0030%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0524%19 Aug
dust25–130.0027%19 Aug
cache13–90.0232%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0426%18 Aug
cache13–50.0413%15 Aug
dust213–20.1822%15 Aug
inferno6–80.0214%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0219%14 Aug
dust26–130.1117%14 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0625%14 Aug
nuke4–130.0329%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0319%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0427%13 Aug
mirage9–130.0137%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0219%13 Aug
nuke13–90.1336%13 Aug
dust213–10.1050%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0512%13 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%13 Aug
train13–40.1317%12 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0221%12 Aug
cache13–50.067%12 Aug
dust26–130.0018%12 Aug
cache5–130.0633%11 Aug
dust213–7-0.0122%11 Aug
anubis9–130.0222%11 Aug
dust213–20.0819%11 Aug
cache11–130.0323%11 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0635%11 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0336%9 Aug
anubis5–130.0614%9 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0830%9 Aug
dust22–13-0.0525%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0325%9 Aug
train13–10-0.0619%8 Aug
inferno13–30.1424%8 Aug
dust212–120.1326%8 Aug
cache13–60.0326%8 Aug
dust213–60.0533%6 Aug
dust213–6-0.0414%5 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0140%5 Aug
cache13–9-0.0715%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0219%5 Aug
nuke6–130.0019%5 Aug
train4–30.0160%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.013%5 Aug
train5–7-0.0625%5 Aug
nuke13–60.0214%4 Aug
dust213–9-0.0129%3 Aug
ancient3–130.0019%3 Aug
nuke0–4-0.0133%3 Aug
mirage5–130.0127%2 Aug
inferno9–30.1143%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0820%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0739%31 Jul
train5–00.1129%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0216%30 Jul
nuke0–13-0.1114%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0221%30 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0228%30 Jul
inferno4–130.0520%24 Jul
cache11–13-0.0143%24 Jul
anubis8–130.0219%23 Jul
dust213–90.0445%23 Jul
inferno1–6-0.0933%22 Jul
cache8–1-0.0015%22 Jul
cache7–130.0531%22 Jul
anubis13–30.0318%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0316%22 Jul
mirage8–5-0.048%22 Jul
dust27–130.1026%22 Jul
inferno13–60.1033%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.0447%22 Jul
anubis13–100.0321%21 Jul
dust25–130.0122%21 Jul
cache13–10.1250%21 Jul
nuke13–110.0715%21 Jul
ancient12–12-0.028%21 Jul
inferno9–00.0542%21 Jul
dust213–70.0427%21 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0318%21 Jul
dust213–10.1317%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0614%21 Jul
nuke13–80.1018%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0715%19 Jul
anubis13–100.0416%18 Jul
dust213–60.0329%18 Jul
dust213–80.0122%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0218%18 Jul
nuke13–70.0730%17 Jul
dust211–130.0036%16 Jul
anubis9–130.0226%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →