The Closer — CS2 Stats

76561198879778850[U:1:919513122]✓ No bans

706Tracked matches21%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
FaceitLevel 3 · 782 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe CloserFACEITLevel 3 · 782 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning35
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD31636Last 10031%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1
Aggression2.6
Utility3.2
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 749ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning3.5
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time769ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 744ms → last ⅓ avg 769ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 7–0
132Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31121939%-0.03
nukeD1731418%-0.03
dust2D1651131%-0.04
infernoC104640%-0.00
ancientD81713%-0.06
anubisA74357%-0.03
overpassD51420%-0.05
train31233%-0.03
cache1010%-0.06
poseidon1010%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
47%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
65.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4549%0.9112.9
Dust22631%0.7813.0
Anubis2462%0.9512.5
Ancient2148%0.7412.4
Nuke1155%0.7311.1
Inferno1050%0.6911.5
Train743%0.8513.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
749msReaction time
21.6%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.82HE damage / grenade
5.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 749.2923ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0219%30 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0635%22 May
nuke10–13-0.0833%19 May
dust25–13-0.100%19 May
dust28–13-0.1010%17 May
cache1–13-0.0630%16 May
nuke7–9-0.075%15 May
mirage3–13-0.0514%11 May
dust29–13-0.0715%9 May
inferno11–13-0.0321%7 May
nuke3–13-0.0527%7 May
overpass6–13-0.1035%6 May
nuke10–13-0.0812%3 May
ancient10–13-0.083%3 May
dust25–13-0.126%23 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0418%19 Apr
dust213–10-0.0730%19 Apr
ancient10–13-0.079%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0414%17 Apr
ancient4–13-0.039%17 Apr
anubis13–110.0517%17 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0623%14 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0320%14 Apr
ancient4–13-0.1021%30 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0213%30 Mar
dust211–13-0.0511%30 Mar
mirage9–13-0.1233%29 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0519%29 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0823%25 Mar
mirage13–40.0338%24 Mar
nuke1–7-0.0175%19 Mar
inferno0–13-0.1133%19 Mar
inferno8–80.1136%19 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0520%19 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1031%18 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0923%18 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0821%13 Mar
nuke1–7-0.0525%13 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0713%8 Mar
anubis13–9-0.1128%5 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0726%5 Mar
mirage6–130.0636%20 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0026%20 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0917%18 Feb
dust27–13-0.080%18 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0930%18 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0329%28 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0123%28 Jan
mirage13–90.0221%26 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0331%26 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0439%24 Jan
dust210–13-0.0435%24 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0520%24 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0417%24 Jan
poseidon8–8-0.0123%24 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0026%22 Jan
vertigo5–13-0.0427%21 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0148%21 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0528%19 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0423%19 Jan
dust213–40.0138%16 Jan
nuke13–50.0129%16 Jan
train5–13-0.0624%16 Jan
overpass9–130.0238%16 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0617%16 Jan
dust215–15-0.0323%16 Jan
inferno6–30.0229%16 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0330%15 Jan
train13–20.0328%15 Jan
inferno7–00.1529%15 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0812%15 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0418%15 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0420%15 Jan
dust28–13-0.0625%15 Jan
dust28–130.0326%14 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0437%14 Jan
mirage13–70.0121%14 Jan
mirage15–150.0230%14 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0425%14 Jan
inferno7–130.0122%14 Jan
nuke13–110.0826%14 Jan
dust213–30.1028%14 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0025%14 Jan
dust213–60.0217%14 Jan
nuke13–50.0329%14 Jan
mirage6–130.0223%14 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0827%13 Jan
dust213–11-0.0726%12 Jan
mirage16–13-0.0323%12 Jan
overpass16–13-0.0410%12 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0027%12 Jan
mirage13–110.0128%12 Jan
nuke13–160.0015%12 Jan
dust27–130.0023%12 Jan
mirage11–130.0022%12 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0432%12 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0917%12 Jan
train7–13-0.0715%12 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0319%12 Jan
nuke5–130.0126%12 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →