breQ — CS2 Stats

76561198877727642[U:1:917461914]

2,394Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,825Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17077 of 36928 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,439 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbreQFACEITLevel 10 · 2,439 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER18,825 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning45
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5248Last 10052%Win rateWLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression4.8
Utility5.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time572ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — dust2 13–7
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32171553%-0.01
ancientA2012860%-0.01
mirageC1771041%-0.00
anubisC125742%0.00
infernoS86275%0.01
nuke32167%-0.03
train32167%-0.01
cache2020%-0.02
overpass21150%-0.03
italy1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,429Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.7ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust277250%1.1216.8
Mirage64550%1.0315.5
Ancient49053%1.0516.5
Anubis34455%1.1116.9
Inferno25546%1.0716.3
Nuke11845%1.0215.7
Train7850%1.1216.8
Overpass7251%1.0515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.8%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
570msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
9.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0509% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0135%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0327%24 Aug
anubis8–130.0430%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0135%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0730%3 Aug
anubis13–70.0432%3 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0825%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0328%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0121%29 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0522%26 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0415%22 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0115%20 Jun
dust213–90.0337%20 Jun
ancient13–40.0418%10 Jun
inferno13–70.0125%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0533%7 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0536%1 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0017%1 Jun
dust24–13-0.0327%30 May
nuke10–13-0.0239%30 May
ancient13–90.0731%11 May
dust27–13-0.0225%11 May
mirage13–50.0035%11 May
ancient6–130.0115%7 May
ancient16–13-0.0325%7 May
cache7–13-0.0427%4 May
cache8–130.0019%4 May
dust213–10.0428%29 Apr
nuke13–00.0035%29 Apr
ancient13–50.0123%27 Apr
anubis9–130.0529%24 Apr
inferno13–100.0417%22 Apr
dust213–50.0229%22 Apr
dust216–120.0318%21 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0518%20 Apr
dust215–19-0.0330%20 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0512%20 Apr
dust28–13-0.0324%17 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0317%3 Apr
dust213–10-0.0537%26 Mar
dust213–7-0.0126%26 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0423%25 Mar
dust26–13-0.0130%23 Mar
dust213–50.0425%22 Mar
anubis16–13-0.0630%21 Mar
anubis13–70.0726%21 Mar
ancient13–110.0025%14 Mar
dust213–110.0740%5 Mar
anubis13–60.0019%2 Mar
mirage5–13-0.1018%25 Feb
dust210–13-0.0119%23 Feb
dust213–7-0.0318%23 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0420%14 Feb
dust22–13-0.1024%9 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0132%23 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0521%19 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0222%19 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0129%22 Dec
train16–140.0329%16 Dec
dust213–10-0.0621%16 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0124%11 Dec
mirage13–20.0321%9 Dec
mirage3–130.0324%9 Dec
mirage16–130.0035%8 Dec
ancient13–5-0.0130%1 Dec
dust210–13-0.0129%23 Nov
mirage19–220.0141%18 Nov
dust214–160.0014%13 Nov
ancient13–5-0.0029%13 Nov
mirage13–40.0736%10 Nov
dust26–13-0.0832%8 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0027%6 Nov
nuke13–8-0.0816%5 Nov
mirage14–160.0426%3 Nov
ancient13–6-0.0213%3 Nov
dust211–13-0.0536%27 Oct
ancient13–40.0023%27 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0217%27 Oct
dust213–60.0241%22 Oct
mirage13–90.0723%22 Oct
ancient10–130.0122%21 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0420%20 Oct
dust213–11-0.0226%15 Oct
dust216–140.0526%15 Oct
mirage9–130.0342%15 Oct
train13–9-0.0515%13 Oct
dust29–13-0.0835%13 Oct
ancient8–13-0.0250%13 Oct
dust213–70.0841%9 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0619%7 Oct
dust213–70.0731%6 Oct
dust223–250.0040%28 Sept
dust213–90.0133%28 Sept
dust25–13-0.0435%26 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0244%24 Sept
inferno13–70.0318%20 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0436%3 Sept
dust213–90.0020%31 Aug
italy4–13-0.0226%29 Aug
train3–13-0.0252%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →