Varanen78

Varanen78 — CS2 Stats

76561198877184229[U:1:916918501]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,069Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,422Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10740 of 41530 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVaranen78PREMIER22,422 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning55
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression5.9
Utility3.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.5
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time558ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–9
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1711665%0.03
ancientC1661038%0.02
anubisC1661038%0.03
cacheB158753%0.01
nukeB147750%0.05
mirageB115645%0.01
vertigoB105550%0.03
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,591Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
86.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15253%1.2317.8
Vertigo10154%1.3918.8
Inferno9349%1.2518.0
Anubis8652%1.2218.4
Nuke6253%1.2519.0
Mirage5648%1.0315.1
Overpass5444%1.2317.5
Dust21533%0.9916.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
552msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
8.93HE damage / grenade
3.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4857 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.55% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.0326%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0228%25 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0014%25 Aug
nuke13–70.0222%25 Aug
anubis9–130.0335%25 Aug
nuke12–20.1025%24 Aug
inferno5–130.0216%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0334%18 Aug
ancient4–130.0211%17 Aug
nuke13–20.1114%17 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0827%17 Aug
anubis13–100.0727%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0123%16 Aug
mirage15–150.0526%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0024%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0134%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0827%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0033%13 Aug
cache3–130.0524%13 Aug
nuke8–130.1124%13 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0326%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0129%12 Aug
vertigo13–100.0522%12 Aug
inferno13–50.0832%12 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0119%12 Aug
inferno8–80.1028%12 Aug
nuke5–130.0329%12 Aug
inferno13–50.0219%9 Aug
vertigo13–2-0.0120%9 Aug
cache4–130.0424%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0314%6 Aug
nuke13–50.1227%6 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0111%6 Aug
inferno13–40.0725%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0729%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0424%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0424%3 Aug
cache5–40.0140%3 Aug
inferno13–60.0634%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0318%28 Jul
mirage16–130.0614%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0716%27 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0418%27 Jul
vertigo13–90.0720%24 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0323%24 Jul
cache13–40.0117%23 Jul
ancient7–130.0427%23 Jul
anubis13–110.1313%23 Jul
cache8–13-0.0520%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0629%22 Jul
ancient13–60.0216%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0916%21 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0120%21 Jul
ancient10–130.0224%21 Jul
cache13–20.0528%21 Jul
nuke13–60.0628%21 Jul
cache13–10-0.0424%20 Jul
nuke13–50.1114%20 Jul
anubis13–90.1723%20 Jul
cache13–110.0533%20 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0322%20 Jul
inferno13–80.0320%20 Jul
cache11–130.0128%20 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0120%20 Jul
cache13–11-0.0420%20 Jul
vertigo12–120.0623%19 Jul
vertigo13–70.0016%19 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0017%19 Jul
vertigo6–130.0538%18 Jul
cache13–110.0633%17 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0025%17 Jul
vertigo13–40.1118%17 Jul
anubis8–130.0120%17 Jul
ancient13–60.0121%17 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0225%17 Jul
cache13–110.0321%12 Jul
nuke12–120.0826%11 Jul
mirage9–130.0222%11 Jul
cache1–130.0118%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0421%11 Jul
nuke6–130.0015%11 Jul
anubis7–130.0439%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0415%5 Jul
inferno12–160.0633%5 Jul
anubis0–130.000%5 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0917%5 Jul
nuke5–130.0126%5 Jul
mirage12–5-0.0211%5 Jul
inferno13–70.0816%5 Jul
anubis13–70.0815%5 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0523%5 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0116%3 Jul
inferno13–10.0923%3 Jul
inferno13–20.0429%3 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0036%3 Jul
ancient13–70.1628%30 Jun
inferno12–8-0.0315%30 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0425%30 Jun
anubis11–130.0624%24 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0528%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →