BABO — CS2 Stats

76561198874269199[U:1:914003471]✓ No bans

768Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,815Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7471 of 14580 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBABOFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,815 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning48
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.1
Aggression3.9
Utility5.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning4.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time540ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — warden 13–9
132Biggest win — cache
9Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 7infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2181338%0.02
mirageB168850%0.02
cacheS1510567%0.03
ancientB136746%0.01
nukeS118373%0.02
infernoD103730%0.01
anubisS770100%0.04
office21150%0.06
boulder1010%0.08
fachwerk1010%-0.13
shelter110100%0.12
warden110100%0.16
overpass110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
56%Win rate
1.51Avg K/D
111.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1100%2.1021.0
Cache1100%1.9019.0
Nuke1100%3.1422.0
Anubis1100%1.5420.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
42.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.8%Spray accuracy
92.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
545msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8171% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0620%22 Jul
cache2–8-0.026%19 Jul
cache13–20.0213%18 Jul
cache13–110.0415%17 Jul
mirage16–120.0511%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.029%17 Jul
ancient9–130.0210%16 Jul
inferno8–130.0625%16 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0220%13 Jul
nuke13–100.0120%13 Jul
anubis13–80.0715%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0514%13 Jul
cache4–130.0313%13 Jul
ancient13–30.0211%13 Jul
ancient8–130.0112%13 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0217%13 Jul
dust28–130.0610%12 Jul
cache13–6-0.0314%12 Jul
cache12–160.0719%12 Jul
dust213–90.0523%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.029%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0616%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0412%11 Jul
dust213–80.0317%10 Jul
cache13–70.0224%10 Jul
anubis13–30.0812%10 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0410%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0420%10 Jul
cache10–00.0718%10 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0214%10 Jul
cache13–30.0824%10 Jul
ancient14–160.029%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.0011%10 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0513%10 Jul
inferno13–30.0620%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0427%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0114%9 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0518%9 Jul
cache13–100.1030%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0324%9 Jul
boulder12–120.0811%9 Jul
fachwerk1–13-0.1326%9 Jul
shelter13–70.1222%8 Jul
office13–110.1038%8 Jul
office11–130.0221%8 Jul
warden13–90.1621%7 Jul
cache8–130.1218%6 Jul
cache13–20.1125%6 Jul
dust213–110.0519%4 Jul
nuke13–50.1422%4 Jul
mirage13–90.0222%4 Jul
cache13–9-0.0413%3 Jul
anubis13–70.038%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0226%3 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0318%3 Jul
dust215–150.0312%3 Jul
dust27–130.0225%2 Jul
mirage13–40.0427%2 Jul
anubis13–7-0.058%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0225%2 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0219%2 Jul
dust210–13-0.0110%1 Jul
mirage13–3-0.019%1 Jul
mirage15–150.038%1 Jul
ancient9–13-0.017%1 Jul
mirage9–130.0012%30 Jun
mirage16–130.0112%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.0526%29 Jun
mirage9–130.0116%29 Jun
inferno13–40.1215%29 Jun
overpass13–110.0825%28 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0117%28 Jun
dust27–130.0432%28 Jun
ancient10–130.0219%27 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0713%27 Jun
nuke13–50.0825%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0419%27 Jun
nuke13–60.0019%27 Jun
dust213–70.0615%27 Jun
dust213–110.0915%27 Jun
anubis13–20.1225%27 Jun
ancient13–50.1112%27 Jun
dust213–60.0711%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0714%27 Jun
dust27–130.0010%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0122%26 Jun
dust21–13-0.0712%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0415%26 Jun
dust210–130.0713%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0116%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0522%25 Jun
mirage13–70.1125%25 Jun
inferno14–16-0.016%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0415%25 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0126%25 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0210%25 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0513%25 Jun
dust26–13-0.0712%25 Jun
inferno11–130.049%25 Jun
dust213–60.0518%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →