shaw

shaw — CS2 Stats

76561198874120857[U:1:913855129]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

975Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,436Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15069 of 49128 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,000Peak Premier on CSDB
1,403Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,403
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,436
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,564 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshawPREMIER21,436 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,403csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning39
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression1.6
Utility5.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time607ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — nuke 13–6
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
137In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2516964%0.01
dust2C1881044%-0.02
cacheC1771041%-0.01
nukeC156940%0.01
ancientS129375%0.01
anubisC73443%-0.00
infernoS64267%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

760Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24454%0.9915.1
Dust215345%1.0415.4
Ancient9752%1.0115.4
Inferno8252%0.8813.3
Nuke8257%1.1715.7
Anubis5360%1.1216.1
Overpass2429%1.0813.7
Train2152%0.9114.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
601msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
13.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.6143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis0–13-0.106%29 Aug
ancient13–10.1518%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0819%29 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0120%28 Aug
inferno13–20.0615%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0416%28 Aug
nuke12–160.0113%28 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0814%28 Aug
cache13–90.0317%28 Aug
nuke13–60.0123%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0532%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0012%28 Aug
dust213–40.1417%25 Aug
anubis9–130.0213%25 Aug
cache13–70.0211%24 Aug
cache8–130.0110%24 Aug
anubis0–3-0.0514%24 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0413%22 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0916%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0211%20 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0211%19 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0613%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0521%19 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0116%19 Aug
ancient13–80.0726%19 Aug
nuke11–130.0518%19 Aug
dust213–100.0127%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0520%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.0315%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0513%18 Aug
cache6–13-0.1120%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0318%18 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0220%18 Aug
cache10–130.0221%18 Aug
nuke13–60.0119%17 Aug
nuke2–10-0.0522%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0514%17 Aug
cache13–30.069%17 Aug
dust216–14-0.0019%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0117%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0311%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0212%17 Aug
dust22–13-0.0621%17 Aug
dust213–50.025%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.080%13 Aug
dust22–13-0.0924%13 Aug
ancient13–8-0.049%12 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0115%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0626%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.0118%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0210%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0621%6 Aug
cache13–110.0416%5 Aug
mirage11–130.1116%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0115%4 Aug
inferno13–50.0419%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0520%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0124%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0118%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0324%4 Aug
cache9–130.0319%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0316%3 Aug
dust216–14-0.0121%3 Aug
cache0–13-0.1013%31 Jul
cache15–15-0.0128%31 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0422%30 Jul
anubis13–40.0827%29 Jul
mirage13–30.0817%29 Jul
dust211–130.0120%29 Jul
cache3–130.0124%28 Jul
anubis13–60.0415%28 Jul
ancient16–130.0818%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0120%28 Jul
nuke13–60.1819%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0518%24 Jul
nuke5–130.0111%24 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0211%24 Jul
nuke13–110.0721%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0214%24 Jul
dust215–15-0.055%24 Jul
cache13–16-0.0417%23 Jul
nuke12–160.0319%23 Jul
mirage10–40.0126%23 Jul
dust213–110.0218%23 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0415%23 Jul
cache16–120.089%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0113%23 Jul
cache4–13-0.0416%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0013%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0111%22 Jul
nuke1–13-0.056%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.086%22 Jul
mirage13–50.1422%22 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0310%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.046%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0012%22 Jul
ancient11–130.0411%21 Jul
mirage16–130.0118%21 Jul
cache13–7-0.0116%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →