souls

souls — CS2 Stats

KR76561198861266088[U:1:901000360]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

406Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating9,959Light Blue band · top ~55.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38192 of 52982 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 768 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsoulsFACEITLevel 3 · 768 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,959 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50482Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.2
Utility4.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 687ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time684ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 7–13
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA30181260%0.01
dust2A2011955%-0.01
nukeC1661038%-0.01
cacheC114736%0.06
ancientC104640%0.01
infernoS86275%0.02
anubis21150%0.06
overpass2020%-0.08
debris1010%-0.22

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

56Matches
43%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
76.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1753%1.1015.0
Inferno1450%1.0514.6
Dust2650%0.8412.3
Nuke475%1.2612.8
Anubis10%0.477.0
Ancient10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
687msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
5.44HE damage / grenade
15.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3077% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–13-0.0417%23 Aug
dust213–80.0219%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0318%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0929%23 Aug
cache11–130.0125%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0913%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0319%18 Aug
mirage11–130.0124%18 Aug
ancient13–10.0224%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0521%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%29 Jul
cache13–60.0531%29 Jul
dust29–5-0.0218%29 Jul
mirage11–130.0017%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0128%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0418%24 Jul
cache13–10.1024%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0920%24 Jul
ancient9–130.0121%24 Jul
mirage13–100.0419%24 Jul
ancient13–30.0613%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0528%24 Jul
dust211–13-0.0323%19 Jul
dust213–10.1319%19 Jul
nuke13–110.0511%19 Jul
anubis13–90.0817%19 Jul
nuke13–20.1418%19 Jul
cache4–13-0.0221%19 Jul
cache13–10.1012%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0318%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0618%17 Jul
cache8–13-0.0212%17 Jul
nuke15–150.0615%16 Jul
cache9–130.0710%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0621%16 Jul
dust213–60.0118%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0519%16 Jul
cache13–80.1121%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0617%16 Jul
ancient13–90.0625%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0316%16 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0318%13 Jul
mirage13–50.0122%13 Jul
ancient13–70.0919%12 Jul
cache7–130.1415%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0122%12 Jul
nuke13–10.1418%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.083%9 Jul
debris0–9-0.2221%9 Jul
nuke1–9-0.2614%9 Jul
cache4–130.0418%9 Jul
cache11–130.0815%9 Jul
dust27–13-0.0427%17 Jun
nuke7–90.0423%17 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0321%27 May
anubis6–130.0431%27 May
mirage2–13-0.096%27 May
dust214–160.0321%27 May
dust20–4-0.060%27 May
dust210–13-0.0415%21 May
mirage16–140.0418%21 May
mirage1–12-0.0319%21 May
dust215–15-0.0513%20 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0218%20 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0333%17 Mar
dust213–6-0.0131%17 Mar
mirage16–130.0113%15 Mar
mirage13–60.0014%8 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0533%8 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0417%7 Mar
inferno6–130.0223%5 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0019%5 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0223%22 Feb
mirage13–100.0412%20 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0318%18 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0719%18 Feb
dust213–9-0.049%17 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0424%17 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0211%17 Feb
dust21–13-0.0320%17 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0222%16 Feb
inferno13–80.0818%16 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0724%14 Feb
dust216–140.0221%14 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0014%14 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0826%14 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0824%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0316%13 Feb
mirage10–13-0.015%11 Feb
inferno13–80.0915%11 Feb
mirage0–20.0325%11 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0310%9 Feb
dust213–110.0212%9 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0119%9 Feb
mirage8–1-0.0520%8 Feb
mirage16–140.0225%8 Feb
inferno13–80.0211%8 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0121%8 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0815%7 Feb
inferno13–70.0523%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →