AvteX — CS2 Stats

76561198857857648[U:1:897591920]

1,364Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,300Blue band · top ~37.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22555 of 33750 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 917 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAvteXFACEITLevel 4 · 917 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,300 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning42
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression4.3
Utility5.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time617ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C28121643%0.00
mirageB189950%-0.01
infernoA148657%-0.02
ancientC135838%0.00
nukeC114736%0.02
cacheC114736%-0.02
anubis41325%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,555Matches
48%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage45248%1.0415.0
Dust244045%0.9915.2
Inferno27454%1.0915.7
Ancient15641%1.0115.3
Nuke13753%1.1116.1
Anubis5739%0.9914.5
Overpass1173%0.9715.2
Cache956%0.7512.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
70.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
609msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5094% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–16-0.0415%27 Aug
anubis1–13-0.067%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.049%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0624%24 Aug
mirage13–11-0.034%24 Aug
inferno5–13-0.097%24 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0212%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0627%23 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0217%23 Aug
nuke14–160.0512%23 Aug
inferno15–15-0.036%22 Aug
dust217–19-0.0213%21 Aug
nuke7–90.0614%20 Aug
dust216–12-0.0133%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0618%18 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0519%17 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0711%17 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0716%17 Aug
dust27–13-0.0233%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0620%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0428%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0215%15 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0224%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.0212%15 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0813%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0415%12 Aug
dust213–90.0415%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.069%10 Aug
mirage13–100.0410%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0620%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0327%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0114%8 Aug
cache13–6-0.0218%7 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0836%6 Aug
dust213–60.0113%6 Aug
mirage6–130.047%5 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0326%4 Aug
ancient9–130.0015%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0016%4 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0522%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0626%2 Aug
cache4–13-0.050%2 Aug
nuke11–130.0211%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0012%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0112%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0144%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0516%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.066%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0710%29 Jul
mirage13–4-0.075%28 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0118%28 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0415%28 Jul
inferno13–70.0021%28 Jul
ancient13–80.0213%27 Jul
dust211–130.0612%26 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0318%26 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0026%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0225%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0628%26 Jul
cache16–120.0116%26 Jul
anubis8–130.0213%26 Jul
dust213–90.0218%25 Jul
dust213–80.0919%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0124%25 Jul
dust213–10.0525%25 Jul
ancient10–130.0317%25 Jul
ancient13–40.1221%25 Jul
dust213–80.0311%23 Jul
dust216–14-0.0123%23 Jul
dust29–130.0420%22 Jul
dust211–130.0215%22 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0126%22 Jul
inferno6–130.0129%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0416%22 Jul
ancient13–30.0523%22 Jul
dust215–150.0223%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.1029%22 Jul
ancient11–130.0113%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0113%21 Jul
cache4–130.0822%21 Jul
dust25–130.0234%21 Jul
dust27–130.017%21 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0231%21 Jul
nuke13–100.0524%21 Jul
cache12–16-0.0314%21 Jul
dust213–80.0026%20 Jul
dust214–16-0.0333%20 Jul
nuke13–110.0714%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.028%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0712%20 Jul
cache13–7-0.0619%19 Jul
cache9–13-0.0616%19 Jul
anubis6–130.0415%19 Jul
cache9–13-0.0714%19 Jul
nuke13–60.0224%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0217%18 Jul
cache9–130.0120%18 Jul
dust213–6-0.0221%18 Jul
inferno13–20.0529%18 Jul
dust211–130.0023%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →