Shiruko

Shiruko — CS2 Stats

FR76561198829413397[U:1:869147669]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

350Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,191Purple band · top ~15.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13924 of 27366 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShirukoFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,191 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning46
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.5
Utility3.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.6
Utility3.0
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.09
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time613ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — ancient 13–3
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA33191458%0.01
infernoC1771041%-0.03
dust2B137654%0.01
vertigoB126650%0.01
ancientA106460%0.05
mirageB63350%0.03
overpassS54180%0.07
cache1010%-0.01
palais1010%-0.17
office1010%-0.07
nuke1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

219Matches
51%Win rate
1.48Avg K/D
ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
90.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
567msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
42.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
13.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5529% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0427%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0021%7 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0421%7 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0213%7 Jul
cache8–13-0.0118%7 Jul
dust28–10.0230%12 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0813%12 Mar
dust29–13-0.0611%12 Mar
dust213–5-0.0021%12 Mar
dust213–00.0730%12 Mar
inferno10–130.0120%25 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0320%25 Dec
inferno1–9-0.2436%25 Dec
inferno6–9-0.1710%24 Nov
vertigo8–8-0.1016%20 Nov
ancient13–9-0.0130%20 Nov
inferno4–9-0.0426%20 Nov
inferno8–80.0131%20 Nov
inferno3–9-0.1916%20 Nov
vertigo9–7-0.0916%20 Nov
vertigo8–80.0111%20 Nov
anubis13–50.0217%20 Nov
inferno3–9-0.1622%20 Nov
inferno7–9-0.0630%16 Nov
vertigo9–50.0347%16 Nov
inferno8–8-0.1019%16 Nov
vertigo9–40.1726%16 Nov
inferno9–30.0628%16 Nov
vertigo4–9-0.1740%16 Nov
inferno9–3-0.0212%16 Nov
palais0–9-0.1740%16 Nov
vertigo9–30.1626%16 Nov
inferno5–9-0.0424%16 Nov
vertigo9–40.0835%16 Nov
inferno9–40.1938%16 Nov
inferno13–110.0220%13 Nov
dust212–120.0619%13 Nov
dust213–6-0.0223%12 Nov
anubis10–130.0844%10 Nov
ancient13–30.2027%10 Nov
vertigo9–0-0.0020%10 Nov
anubis10–130.0729%10 Nov
anubis13–110.0511%20 Apr
anubis13–80.0332%20 Apr
dust20–13-0.080%20 Apr
inferno13–80.0627%17 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0217%17 Apr
anubis0–13-0.17100%17 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0219%16 Apr
dust212–120.0116%16 Apr
anubis4–13-0.1127%16 Apr
anubis2–0-0.120%16 Apr
office11–13-0.077%7 Apr
anubis13–50.0419%7 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0315%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.0426%7 Apr
inferno13–30.1026%5 Apr
dust213–90.0929%5 Apr
dust213–50.0226%5 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0312%2 Apr
anubis13–70.0426%29 Mar
anubis13–70.0118%28 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0017%26 Mar
anubis13–60.0026%26 Mar
anubis13–70.0421%25 Mar
anubis12–120.0335%25 Mar
anubis7–30.1233%25 Mar
overpass13–100.0016%10 Jan
ancient9–130.0430%10 Jan
ancient13–10.0731%29 Dec
anubis13–40.1434%29 Dec
ancient9–130.0529%27 Dec
ancient13–20.0617%26 Dec
overpass13–60.1526%26 Dec
overpass13–80.1214%24 Dec
nuke11–130.0216%24 Dec
overpass13–50.1315%23 Dec
anubis13–90.0930%21 Dec
anubis13–30.0336%21 Dec
overpass3–13-0.0330%21 Dec
vertigo10–13-0.0325%21 Dec
anubis13–90.0522%20 Dec
ancient13–100.1029%18 Dec
dust213–70.0320%17 Dec
vertigo5–130.0116%12 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0032%12 Nov
inferno13–110.0843%10 Nov
ancient13–80.0318%10 Nov
vertigo14–160.0111%23 Aug
mirage4–16-0.0316%23 Aug
anubis14–160.0814%22 Aug
mirage16–80.1716%22 Aug
anubis7–160.0110%15 Aug
anubis14–160.0723%9 Jun
anubis16–40.0444%9 Jun
mirage16–40.057%24 May
anubis11–16-0.009%24 May
anubis16–60.0618%22 May
anubis14–16-0.0527%21 May
mirage13–160.0317%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →