LO PEEK — CS2 Stats

76561198827021682[U:1:866755954]

1,918Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,067Blue band · top ~43.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16933 of 24091 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLO PEEKFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,067 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning54
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateLWWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression7.9
Utility4.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning5.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time690ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
1211In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2718967%0.02
mirageA2214864%0.02
nukeB1910953%0.05
ancientB137654%0.02
anubisD103730%-0.02
infernoS75271%0.01
cache2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
52%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
77.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.0714.3
Anubis956%0.9012.1
Ancient757%0.8111.0
Dust2743%0.7311.4
Vertigo650%1.1015.7
Nuke560%0.9612.4
Inferno20%0.6411.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
673msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.51HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0114%26 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0123%26 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0220%25 Aug
dust211–130.0223%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0420%25 Aug
anubis10–3-0.0411%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0510%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0113%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0017%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0820%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0614%22 Aug
inferno16–140.0111%22 Aug
ancient13–10.0419%21 Aug
mirage8–00.0033%21 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0114%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0119%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0514%20 Aug
mirage14–160.0314%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0414%18 Aug
dust213–50.0327%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0815%17 Aug
inferno11–130.0012%17 Aug
dust213–30.0617%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0415%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0319%16 Aug
nuke13–10.2214%15 Aug
dust216–14-0.0418%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.028%11 Aug
dust28–20.0826%11 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0214%11 Aug
mirage4–80.0320%11 Aug
cache15–15-0.0512%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0422%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0619%9 Aug
ancient10–7-0.0317%8 Aug
nuke7–130.0823%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0223%8 Aug
inferno16–130.0228%8 Aug
dust213–80.0125%8 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0119%8 Aug
dust216–13-0.0224%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0111%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0628%6 Aug
ancient10–130.0129%6 Aug
dust213–80.0622%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0416%5 Aug
mirage13–80.1526%5 Aug
nuke13–40.0818%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0517%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0511%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0420%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0819%3 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0312%2 Aug
dust213–100.0319%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0728%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0821%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0219%2 Aug
nuke13–70.0920%1 Aug
ancient13–50.0620%1 Aug
mirage4–130.0418%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0026%29 Jul
dust213–110.0415%29 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0523%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0622%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0610%27 Jul
ancient16–140.0821%27 Jul
dust213–11-0.0118%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0321%27 Jul
dust213–20.1033%26 Jul
inferno13–90.0430%25 Jul
cache10–13-0.0513%25 Jul
anubis9–130.0620%25 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0123%24 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0221%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0125%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0121%23 Jul
dust210–130.0731%22 Jul
dust213–40.0821%22 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0423%22 Jul
inferno2–1-0.0267%22 Jul
dust213–70.1521%22 Jul
nuke10–130.0232%22 Jul
dust213–50.0626%22 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0011%19 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0328%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0015%19 Jul
ancient13–80.0326%19 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0811%18 Jul
ancient10–130.1019%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0710%18 Jul
nuke11–130.0214%18 Jul
inferno13–30.0317%18 Jul
nuke12–120.0717%16 Jul
dust213–50.1918%16 Jul
dust213–110.0713%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0721%15 Jul
nuke13–40.1019%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0218%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0017%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →