lil trzcy — CS2 Stats

76561198819481290[U:1:859215562]

227Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlil trzcyFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim21
Positioning49
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40564Last 10040%Win rateWWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.1
Aggression3.3
Utility3.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 708ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.1
Positioning4.9
Utility3.1
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time701ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 711ms → last ⅓ avg 701ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — warden 8–0
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 30infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30151550%-0.05
mirageD1861233%-0.04
nukeB157847%-0.04
vertigoD1551033%-0.07
anubisD72529%-0.05
ancientD62433%-0.05
infernoD51420%-0.07
overpass21150%-0.05
warden110100%0.10
office1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
30%Win rate
0.61Avg K/D
44.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo1331%0.6310.4
Mirage1225%0.579.3
Nuke1242%0.587.4
Anubis922%0.6510.4
Inferno40%0.4810.3
Dust2475%1.0010.5
Ancient20%0.386.5
Overpass250%0.6510.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
26.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
708msReaction time
18.9%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.98HE damage / grenade
5.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 707.8102ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.8561% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0030%12 Apr
dust213–7-0.0326%12 Apr
dust213–3-0.070%19 Mar
dust213–11-0.0913%4 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0515%27 Feb
nuke10–13-0.090%26 Feb
mirage6–3-0.0822%26 Feb
dust29–13-0.0317%26 Feb
anubis3–13-0.1225%24 Feb
dust27–13-0.0131%15 Feb
dust213–20.0216%15 Feb
warden8–00.1013%15 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0517%10 Feb
dust26–13-0.0727%10 Feb
office10–13-0.0212%8 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0125%8 Feb
dust213–11-0.0118%8 Feb
dust28–13-0.0625%8 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0713%23 Jan
nuke13–90.006%28 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0313%1 Feb
dust213–1-0.0929%1 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0313%12 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0415%7 Jan
vertigo13–8-0.100%7 Jan
dust213–100.026%5 Dec
nuke4–13-0.098%29 Nov
ancient5–13-0.1110%29 Nov
nuke6–130.0112%15 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.085%15 Aug
mirage7–130.026%11 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0513%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0111%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0410%31 Jul
dust212–16-0.0414%30 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0811%13 Jul
ancient13–11-0.037%10 Jul
dust215–15-0.019%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0311%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.059%6 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0719%6 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.115%5 Jul
vertigo16–12-0.0216%4 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0616%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0411%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0412%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0413%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0420%28 Jun
dust213–10-0.0719%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0518%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0717%20 Jun
vertigo13–10-0.006%17 Jun
mirage7–13-0.014%16 Jun
dust24–13-0.0925%5 Jun
dust213–4-0.030%8 May
dust210–13-0.077%22 Mar
anubis10–13-0.085%21 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0814%21 Feb
dust27–13-0.1425%17 Feb
nuke13–8-0.117%10 Feb
vertigo13–6-0.0810%10 Feb
dust213–4-0.0433%9 Feb
dust213–4-0.1111%1 Feb
dust26–13-0.1220%1 Feb
dust22–13-0.037%24 Jan
mirage9–13-0.096%21 Jan
nuke13–90.008%21 Jan
vertigo2–13-0.1214%6 Jan
mirage17–19-0.0517%26 Dec
mirage9–13-0.066%25 Dec
vertigo4–13-0.1025%25 Dec
ancient13–9-0.088%25 Dec
vertigo7–13-0.0429%25 Dec
nuke0–13-0.0625%24 Dec
anubis10–13-0.0714%23 Dec
mirage13–100.0617%23 Dec
mirage8–13-0.050%23 Dec
overpass13–5-0.0114%22 Dec
overpass9–13-0.083%8 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0812%8 Dec
nuke13–00.0313%8 Dec
ancient9–130.0016%7 Dec
vertigo5–9-0.1514%6 Dec
dust213–9-0.0125%6 Dec
vertigo15–15-0.0320%3 Dec
mirage14–16-0.0717%1 Dec
nuke13–40.0614%1 Dec
anubis11–13-0.0113%1 Dec
vertigo7–13-0.0411%30 Nov
vertigo13–110.0218%11 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0224%11 Nov
inferno3–13-0.0529%17 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0523%15 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0524%5 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0414%5 Sept
anubis13–110.0513%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0615%4 Sept
anubis6–13-0.098%4 Sept
inferno5–13-0.1029%2 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0533%2 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →