Manigordo — CS2 Stats

76561198815345912[U:1:855080184]✓ No bans

430Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating2,773Grey band · top ~88.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39793 of 51003 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGManigordoFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER2,773 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning42
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40564Last 10040%Win rateWWWWLLTLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression5.6
Utility1.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 741ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.2
Utility1.2
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time741ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 697ms → last ⅓ avg 741ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 10.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–9
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%-0.02
infernoD1851328%-0.02
dust2D1861233%-0.02
ancientA127558%-0.01
overpassD93633%-0.03
cacheC73443%-0.01
nukeC52340%-0.03
anubis2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches
31%Win rate
0.43Avg K/D
ADR
24%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10%0.6111.0
Mirage10%0.265.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
13.1°Preaim
741msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.00Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
0.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0844° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4958% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 741.4346ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0512%30 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0013%30 Aug
inferno13–30.077%28 Aug
mirage16–140.049%28 Aug
cache13–160.0015%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.0113%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0419%14 Aug
mirage9–130.029%20 Jul
cache13–20.077%20 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0212%19 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0512%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0816%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.029%18 Jul
cache10–130.0114%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0517%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0216%15 Jul
cache11–13-0.0914%11 Jul
ancient13–40.013%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0113%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.048%11 Jul
cache13–6-0.028%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.046%4 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0513%23 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0116%18 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0114%5 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0111%5 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0618%4 Jun
inferno10–130.0118%1 Jun
dust213–70.0412%28 May
inferno6–13-0.0217%28 May
ancient13–90.0319%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0915%21 May
ancient9–13-0.058%21 May
inferno13–8-0.0219%20 May
mirage13–70.0111%20 May
ancient6–13-0.009%20 May
dust210–13-0.0110%12 May
nuke7–13-0.065%8 May
inferno7–13-0.102%8 May
inferno14–16-0.013%8 May
mirage13–9-0.037%8 May
inferno5–13-0.0514%8 May
mirage10–6-0.0221%6 May
mirage13–20.0110%6 May
mirage11–13-0.059%6 May
dust213–8-0.0217%5 May
inferno11–130.0315%5 May
mirage13–8-0.0416%5 May
ancient13–9-0.0413%4 May
overpass5–13-0.0314%4 May
ancient11–13-0.039%4 May
mirage13–7-0.0110%3 May
dust211–13-0.0211%1 May
dust27–20.0358%1 May
cache13–6-0.0524%1 May
mirage13–20.0312%22 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0210%22 Apr
ancient11–130.029%21 Apr
nuke15–150.0313%21 Apr
mirage14–16-0.087%20 Apr
dust26–13-0.0611%8 Apr
nuke13–7-0.096%8 Apr
overpass6–130.0215%8 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0620%8 Apr
dust29–13-0.0716%8 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0710%7 Apr
nuke11–13-0.017%7 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0315%7 Apr
anubis11–13-0.036%7 Apr
overpass13–9-0.037%7 Apr
inferno4–13-0.015%7 Apr
mirage13–16-0.037%6 Apr
dust213–10-0.0411%6 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0911%6 Apr
inferno13–5-0.004%6 Apr
dust22–13-0.0713%6 Apr
dust28–130.0114%6 Apr
mirage9–13-0.059%5 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0511%5 Apr
dust29–13-0.048%5 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0510%5 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0310%5 Apr
overpass13–5-0.0412%3 Apr
dust23–13-0.033%3 Apr
dust213–100.0311%3 Apr
ancient13–6-0.057%3 Apr
nuke13–9-0.019%3 Apr
inferno11–13-0.075%31 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0313%31 Mar
dust24–13-0.0713%31 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0713%31 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0611%31 Mar
overpass11–13-0.027%31 Mar
dust213–90.1021%31 Mar
mirage6–130.0213%30 Mar
mirage6–130.0018%30 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0710%27 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0511%27 Mar
mirage1–13-0.047%26 Mar
dust23–13-0.109%26 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →