#2 ASIAN/SCOTTISH CS ENJOYER — CS2 Stats

76561198799968009[U:1:839702281]

1,952Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,562 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG#2 ASIAN/SCOTTISH CS ENJO…FACEITLevel 6 · 1,562 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning45
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48457Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression4.6
Utility3.7
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.5
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time576ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
714In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 12cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC28101836%-0.01
dust2C1771041%0.01
mirageS128467%0.06
ancientA117464%0.04
cacheD103730%0.02
anubisA95456%0.04
nukeA74357%0.02
overpass330100%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.05
fachwerk1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

782Matches
50%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
81.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26548%1.2416.2
Anubis17357%1.3117.8
Dust210550%1.1516.5
Ancient10544%1.3318.4
Inferno8149%1.3218.1
Nuke2438%1.3715.8
Vertigo1662%1.1017.4
Cache825%1.0516.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
579msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
13.51HE damage / grenade
3.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.376 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3981% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0432%25 Aug
cache4–130.0217%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0524%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0833%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0725%14 Aug
dust213–70.0116%14 Aug
anubis13–80.0625%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.1019%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.0113%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0813%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0429%12 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0221%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0018%7 Aug
vertigo13–70.0726%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0229%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0425%4 Aug
dust29–13-0.0628%3 Aug
inferno13–90.0027%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0419%2 Aug
anubis13–90.0538%1 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0815%31 Jul
dust216–13-0.0324%30 Jul
anubis9–130.0616%28 Jul
ancient5–130.0021%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0422%27 Jul
cache11–13-0.0122%21 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1321%21 Jul
ancient11–130.0117%20 Jul
nuke13–90.0727%20 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0318%19 Jul
dust211–130.0424%19 Jul
dust212–120.0223%19 Jul
mirage12–120.0519%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0030%19 Jul
mirage13–80.1036%18 Jul
mirage9–130.0712%18 Jul
dust213–100.0722%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0718%18 Jul
cache12–120.0028%16 Jul
cache13–80.0811%15 Jul
cache12–12-0.0124%13 Jul
mirage16–120.0113%13 Jul
anubis13–30.1517%12 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0017%10 Jul
dust213–50.0322%10 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0226%7 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0118%1 Jul
nuke13–70.0521%30 Jun
mirage13–80.0329%30 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0212%30 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0116%21 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0118%20 Jun
ancient13–80.036%20 Jun
inferno9–00.000%20 Jun
inferno9–00.0350%20 Jun
inferno9–00.04100%20 Jun
inferno0–9-0.1413%20 Jun
inferno5–9-0.1229%18 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0426%18 Jun
vertigo8–130.0331%18 Jun
inferno9–6-0.1013%17 Jun
inferno9–60.1527%13 Jun
ancient5–130.0341%9 Jun
ancient13–110.0918%9 Jun
inferno11–130.0816%27 May
dust211–130.0119%26 May
nuke13–110.0339%26 May
inferno16–140.0425%24 May
dust211–130.0524%24 May
ancient13–100.0317%23 May
nuke15–150.0121%23 May
overpass13–10-0.0126%22 May
anubis13–110.0420%21 May
dust211–13-0.0124%21 May
overpass13–8-0.0118%20 May
inferno15–150.0027%20 May
inferno5–9-0.0720%20 May
inferno9–70.0427%20 May
dust23–130.0718%19 May
cache11–130.0117%19 May
cache13–40.0627%19 May
ancient13–50.0813%17 May
inferno10–130.0126%17 May
dust213–110.0718%17 May
mirage10–130.1419%17 May
cache1–13-0.059%17 May
dust213–10-0.0215%17 May
anubis10–130.0316%16 May
inferno6–130.0824%10 May
cache11–130.0223%6 May
dust213–80.0923%5 May
dust29–130.0015%1 May
cache13–30.073%29 Apr
anubis9–130.0735%26 Apr
mirage13–90.1723%24 Apr
mirage11–130.0528%23 Apr
ancient13–20.1930%22 Apr
ancient13–10.0417%22 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0125%18 Apr
mirage13–40.0625%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →