。

— CS2 Stats

76561198798955142[U:1:838689414]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,520Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning45
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateWLWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression5.7
Utility3.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.5
Utility3.3
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time600ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33151845%-0.00
dust2B21111052%-0.02
infernoB158753%-0.00
ancientC146843%-0.01
nukeC73443%-0.01
anubisA53260%-0.01
cache41325%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

932Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23154%1.0314.4
Inferno11350%0.9713.9
Vertigo7753%0.9413.9
Ancient7653%1.0214.4
Dust27251%0.9514.9
Anubis7154%1.0414.6
Nuke1650%0.9213.6
Overpass1060%0.9015.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
605msReaction time
20.7%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
4.86HE damage / grenade
4.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4722 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.6622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–6-0.0610%17 Aug
mirage7–130.0138%21 Jul
mirage13–10.0121%17 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0223%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0615%13 Jul
mirage13–30.1522%10 Jul
mirage16–19-0.0823%8 Jul
dust213–60.0318%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0124%25 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0633%22 Jun
overpass2–3-0.100%18 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0416%17 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0120%27 May
ancient13–8-0.0428%27 May
dust28–13-0.0042%26 May
ancient13–6-0.0217%26 May
mirage13–7-0.0723%25 May
dust213–1-0.0220%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0316%24 May
nuke13–60.0329%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0424%23 May
ancient3–13-0.0315%23 May
mirage13–40.0225%22 May
mirage13–50.1029%21 May
mirage4–13-0.089%21 May
dust25–13-0.0136%21 May
dust213–90.0422%20 May
dust27–13-0.0838%20 May
mirage13–70.0422%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0520%18 May
dust21–11-0.1117%16 May
ancient5–130.0420%15 May
inferno8–13-0.0430%15 May
ancient13–70.0619%14 May
inferno13–10-0.0225%13 May
dust29–13-0.0731%13 May
mirage5–130.0123%11 May
mirage13–110.0016%11 May
inferno13–30.0015%10 May
dust213–9-0.0316%9 May
ancient12–16-0.0125%8 May
inferno7–13-0.0022%8 May
mirage5–13-0.0616%8 May
mirage13–160.0019%8 May
mirage11–00.0812%7 May
anubis13–11-0.0126%7 May
mirage13–70.0718%7 May
dust213–0-0.0438%7 May
ancient9–13-0.0018%7 May
dust213–7-0.0729%6 May
mirage7–13-0.0119%6 May
nuke13–70.0722%6 May
dust211–13-0.0418%5 May
dust213–90.0228%4 May
ancient10–13-0.0816%4 May
mirage13–20.0131%2 May
cache12–120.0225%30 Apr
cache4–130.0142%30 Apr
cache13–4-0.0634%30 Apr
cache10–13-0.0134%28 Apr
inferno22–19-0.0410%26 Apr
dust213–60.0522%23 Apr
mirage16–140.0119%23 Apr
inferno13–20.1015%22 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0216%22 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0219%22 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0520%21 Apr
anubis13–40.0415%19 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0115%16 Apr
ancient13–90.0613%15 Apr
mirage16–140.0114%15 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0711%15 Apr
dust213–80.029%15 Apr
mirage14–160.0223%13 Apr
mirage6–130.0718%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0718%12 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0419%9 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0417%9 Apr
dust26–13-0.0623%9 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0419%8 Apr
ancient11–130.0329%8 Apr
dust210–13-0.0225%8 Apr
inferno7–130.0234%8 Apr
dust23–13-0.0243%5 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0413%4 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0416%1 Apr
dust213–60.0115%1 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0114%31 Mar
nuke12–160.0028%28 Mar
ancient13–60.0224%26 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0118%26 Mar
inferno5–130.0123%25 Mar
inferno13–110.0016%25 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0714%25 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0220%25 Mar
inferno11–130.0227%24 Mar
mirage16–140.0225%23 Mar
dust213–90.0423%23 Mar
inferno13–50.0121%22 Mar
dust213–16-0.0719%18 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →