[fahazé] Desirement — CS2 Stats

76561198452405723[U:1:492139995]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

542Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating17,374Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#18357 of 34531 tracked

WingmanSilver III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44

Positioning48

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4

Aggression4.3

Utility3.8

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4

Positioning4.8

Utility3.8

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time603ms−31ms

first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%−6.1%

first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 32infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	32	19–13	59%	0.01
mirage	C	25	10–15	40%	-0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
inferno	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches

0%Win rate

0.74Avg K/D

66.0ADR

21%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.1%Spray accuracy

68.7%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

594msReaction time

37.0%T opening success

33.6%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

4.86HE damage / grenade

10.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.9604% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	1–13	-0.07	23%	29 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	12%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	26%	24 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	20%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	23%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	8%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	9%	16 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.05	20%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	30%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.07	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	19%	12 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	27%	12 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	5%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	18%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	11%	10 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.05	4%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	18%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.09	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	30%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.10	12%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	31%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	38%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–1	0.08	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	27%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	20%	1 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.00	28%	31 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	27%	30 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	25%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	26%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.10	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	25%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	21%	20 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.00	23%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	43%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	41%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	32%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	27%	8 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	28%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.00	18%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	18%	22 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	20%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.05	11%	17 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	17%	17 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	17%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.14	27%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.06	22%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.06	34%	13 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	19%	13 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.02	21%	8 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	13%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.09	27%	7 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	24%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.07	37%	4 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	27%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	34%	2 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	35%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.04	29%	1 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.04	25%	31 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	32%	30 May →
mirage	13–4	0.01	21%	29 May →
mirage	9–13	0.12	30%	27 May →
inferno	4–13	0.04	30%	21 May →
dust2	13–3	0.01	30%	18 May →
mirage	9–13	0.09	24%	18 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	15%	16 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	33%	14 May →
nuke	13–11	0.07	29%	13 May →
ancient	13–9	0.03	24%	13 May →
overpass	13–3	0.02	20%	13 May →
inferno	13–5	0.05	17%	12 May →
ancient	13–4	0.01	16%	11 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	15%	11 May →
nuke	13–8	0.07	29%	11 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	22%	10 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	32%	10 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	14%	10 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	13%	8 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.09	10%	8 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	27%	8 May →
dust2	13–8	0.02	30%	8 May →
mirage	13–2	-0.04	16%	8 May →
inferno	11–13	0.11	28%	8 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	21%	7 May →
dust2	13–7	0.09	28%	7 May →