knzin — CS2 Stats

76561198449946950[U:1:489681222]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

773Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,096 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning59

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–59Last 10041%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression8.6

Utility3.9

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.9

Utility3.9

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time569ms+33ms

first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–2Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

7–16In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 47% over 55cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	55	26–29	47%	0.01
nuke	C	24	9–15	38%	0.01
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.02
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
dust2	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,917Matches

50%Win rate

1.37Avg K/D

81.8ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	124	52%	1.33	18.4
Dust2	43	42%	1.13	17.3
Anubis	31	58%	1.14	16.2
Nuke	28	43%	1.22	15.5
Ancient	16	31%	1.01	14.6
Cache	11	64%	1.08	18.1
Inferno	9	56%	1.08	14.1
Vertigo	6	50%	1.23	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.5%Spray accuracy

79.4%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

562msReaction time

33.7%T opening success

60.7%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

7.97HE damage / grenade

5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4991 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.6978% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	0.02	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.01	23%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	19%	8 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	16%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	21%	20 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	5%	19 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	30%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	25%	16 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.01	32%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	18%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	20%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.05	14%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.00	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	31%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	25%	14 Jul →
mirage	25–22	0.02	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.01	7%	11 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	26%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	23%	9 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.05	42%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	26%	30 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	40%	29 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.00	26%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.02	24%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	25%	28 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	8%	27 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.08	15%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.00	19%	26 Jun →
anubis	14–16	-0.07	8%	26 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	30%	26 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	31%	26 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.01	21%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	33%	24 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	22%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.04	23%	23 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.12	22%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	29%	23 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.07	13%	22 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	10%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.11	24%	21 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.02	35%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	20%	20 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.01	11%	20 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.08	31%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	15%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	22%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.00	26%	19 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.01	19%	19 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	9%	19 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	20%	19 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	9%	19 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	26%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	30%	18 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.02	15%	18 Jun →
mirage	16–19	-0.05	15%	18 Jun →
cache	22–19	0.02	13%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.14	43%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.14	22%	17 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	25%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.05	30%	17 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	16%	17 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.06	16%	16 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	13%	16 Jun →
nuke	16–14	0.01	21%	16 Jun →
mirage	16–13	0.03	25%	15 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	19%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	21%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.00	40%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	33%	14 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.02	21%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.06	18%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.14	24%	13 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	14%	13 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.07	33%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	28%	13 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.00	15%	12 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	18%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.03	24%	11 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	9%	11 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	23%	11 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	3%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	19%	11 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.06	8%	11 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.01	32%	11 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	18%	10 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.05	17%	10 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	13%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	14%	10 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.01	14%	10 Jun →