chudmaxxer29 — CS2 Stats

76561198442816703[U:1:482550975]✓ No bans

646Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchudmaxxer29FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning49
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY503911Last 10050%Win rateTLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression3.6
Utility5.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time622ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — office 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 20infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25121348%0.04
cacheB24121250%0.03
mirageS2013765%0.03
infernoD103730%0.03
officeD93633%0.07
vertigoB63350%0.01
nuke43175%0.01
ancient21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

76Matches
58%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
82.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1844%1.2517.3
Dust21155%1.2817.7
Inferno1060%1.1420.3
Ancient633%0.8012.7
Nuke4100%1.1622.3
Train2100%1.4617.0
Anubis10%0.7112.0
Vertigo1100%1.0011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
617msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
5.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo12–12-0.0716%30 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0725%30 Aug
dust210–130.0630%30 Aug
inferno1–13-0.074%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.015%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0519%16 Aug
cache13–5-0.0114%15 Aug
office13–110.0324%8 Aug
nuke13–90.0413%8 Aug
dust213–40.1019%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0216%2 Aug
inferno6–130.0211%1 Aug
inferno13–80.1124%24 Jul
dust29–130.0918%24 Jul
dust25–130.0517%12 Jul
inferno13–90.0222%7 Jul
dust210–13-0.0115%7 Jul
inferno9–130.0320%6 Jul
dust213–1-0.0240%6 Jul
office13–100.0956%5 Jul
cache13–30.1221%5 Jul
dust212–12-0.0113%5 Jul
inferno5–130.0710%1 Jul
dust25–13-0.0626%1 Jul
cache13–50.0918%1 Jul
ancient15–150.0119%29 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0216%28 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0118%28 Jun
dust213–40.0731%28 Jun
dust213–20.0810%28 Jun
dust213–30.0416%28 Jun
mirage13–10.0920%28 Jun
mirage13–5-0.008%28 Jun
mirage13–30.0817%28 Jun
dust213–70.0417%28 Jun
mirage13–50.0420%28 Jun
dust213–20.0518%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0815%27 Jun
inferno8–130.0426%24 Jun
nuke13–80.0126%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0318%21 Jun
cache11–130.0218%20 Jun
mirage13–110.0424%20 Jun
dust213–70.0626%7 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.018%2 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0220%2 Jun
dust213–80.0910%2 Jun
vertigo12–120.0525%30 May
dust26–130.0215%30 May
dust24–13-0.0215%27 May
cache11–130.0228%27 May
office7–130.0414%23 May
inferno6–130.0422%23 May
dust27–130.0530%23 May
cache10–130.0522%23 May
office12–120.0620%16 May
mirage13–100.1116%16 May
vertigo13–70.069%16 May
dust25–130.0820%16 May
cache13–110.0312%15 May
dust210–130.0612%11 May
mirage13–110.0714%11 May
inferno11–130.0818%11 May
dust25–13-0.0410%11 May
ancient13–70.0114%11 May
vertigo13–9-0.0016%10 May
office9–130.0428%10 May
mirage13–100.1121%10 May
dust213–60.1013%10 May
cache13–70.1021%10 May
office13–90.1729%9 May
mirage11–130.0620%9 May
dust213–110.1422%9 May
office10–130.0633%9 May
office12–120.020%9 May
mirage13–100.0520%9 May
office8–130.0817%8 May
cache8–130.0511%8 May
mirage13–10.1716%7 May
nuke13–4-0.019%7 May
mirage12–12-0.0521%6 May
cache12–12-0.025%6 May
cache13–5-0.0121%5 May
cache13–100.0216%5 May
cache13–20.119%5 May
inferno13–80.0215%3 May
vertigo7–130.0213%3 May
dust213–60.0416%3 May
cache5–130.0115%3 May
cache13–60.0419%3 May
cache9–13-0.0019%2 May
cache12–120.0520%2 May
mirage13–90.0719%2 May
cache9–13-0.0215%2 May
cache13–70.0317%2 May
cache13–100.0914%2 May
cache13–70.0024%1 May
cache4–13-0.0621%1 May
cache9–13-0.0115%30 Apr
cache12–120.0527%30 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →