АНИМЕШНИК — CS2 Stats

76561198439309480[U:1:479043752]✓ No bans

466Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning48

Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8

Aggression5.2

Utility1.6

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning4.8

Utility1.6

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.06

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time553ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — cache 13–1

13–0Biggest win — dust2

13Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	13–13	50%	0.03
dust2	A	24	14–10	58%	-0.01
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	0.05
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	0.03
office	D	7	2–5	29%	0.09
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

246Matches

57%Win rate

1.55Avg K/D

100.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	31	55%	1.34	18.8
Dust2	21	62%	1.35	21.4
Ancient	15	40%	1.26	18.7
Nuke	14	71%	1.53	20.4
Anubis	13	77%	1.54	20.8
Train	6	83%	1.82	33.5
Overpass	5	20%	1.21	15.6
Inferno	4	50%	1.10	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

83.7%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

558msReaction time

27.8%T opening success

40.3%CT opening success

0.28Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

8.39HE damage / grenade

1.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2808 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.8315% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	11–13	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	12–3	-0.01	25%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.08	53%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	22%	2 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.08	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	2 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.05	30%	5 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.01	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	31%	2 Jul →
office	13–8	0.13	25%	2 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.00	13%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.03	14%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	19%	28 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	38%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	14%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–4	-0.00	22%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	18%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.07	21%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.05	24%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	30%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.05	21%	27 Jun →
mirage	6–1	-0.05	13%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	12%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	35%	23 Jun →
nuke	2–0	0.00	50%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	8%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.02	16%	23 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	13%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.05	23%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	14%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	35%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	25%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.15	12%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.08	17%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.00	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.03	19%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.07	27%	22 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	27%	21 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	10%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.06	23%	21 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	13%	21 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	24%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	18%	21 Jun →
vertigo	0–5	0.02	29%	20 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	10%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	13%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.04	23%	18 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.19	10%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.01	13%	17 Jun →
office	3–13	-0.06	30%	17 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	20%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.11	23%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.06	7%	16 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	10%	15 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	14%	15 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.02	13%	12 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.00	16%	12 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.06	15%	11 Jun →
train	4–13	0.06	21%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.16	22%	10 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	25%	9 Jun →
office	13–6	0.02	14%	8 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	13%	8 Jun →
overpass	12–12	-0.01	13%	7 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.24	20%	7 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.00	22%	7 Jun →
office	4–13	0.10	34%	5 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.09	23%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.11	22%	31 May →
dust2	3–13	0.05	24%	17 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	20%	17 May →
office	8–13	0.15	15%	17 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	19%	11 May →
office	5–13	0.09	24%	11 May →
office	12–12	0.22	24%	10 May →
mirage	3–13	0.03	18%	10 May →
dust2	13–10	0.03	24%	20 Apr →
ancient	7–13	0.08	29%	19 Apr →
nuke	12–12	0.17	37%	6 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.15	9%	28 Mar →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	16%	28 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.07	21%	27 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	20%	27 Mar →
anubis	10–3	0.17	16%	25 Mar →
inferno	5–13	0.08	20%	25 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.08	19%	25 Mar →
mirage	2–13	0.08	43%	21 Mar →
train	3–13	0.01	26%	19 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.20	38%	18 Mar →
warden	11–13	0.07	30%	15 Mar →
overpass	8–13	-0.05	30%	14 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	16%	14 Mar →
nuke	11–13	0.02	30%	13 Mar →
mirage	8–13	0.16	29%	13 Mar →