Pann — CS2 Stats

76561198439159919[U:1:478894191]

1,143Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,896Purple band · top ~20.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14749 of 26090 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPannFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,896 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning55
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42562Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression5.9
Utility5.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch7.2

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time561ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–4
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 23mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA23131057%0.01
ancientD2171433%-0.03
dust2C2081240%-0.01
anubisC156940%-0.03
mirageD103730%-0.03
nukeD62433%-0.03
cache330100%-0.03
overpass2020%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
64.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1662%0.8913.3
Mirage1443%0.8212.7
Ancient1136%0.8614.7
Nuke1070%0.8714.2
Inferno944%0.9714.7
Dust2425%0.9313.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
8.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3163% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0218%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0521%25 Aug
dust211–130.0419%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0540%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0113%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0117%23 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0221%23 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0520%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0522%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0713%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0416%21 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0213%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0422%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0324%20 Aug
mirage14–160.0119%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0421%18 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0425%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0329%18 Aug
dust213–20.0315%17 Aug
ancient13–90.0417%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0019%17 Aug
inferno13–3-0.048%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0135%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0518%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0422%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0631%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0030%11 Aug
dust213–70.0832%11 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0215%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0416%11 Aug
inferno3–10-0.0424%11 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1124%10 Aug
dust211–13-0.0138%10 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0424%10 Aug
dust211–130.0219%10 Aug
cache13–9-0.0629%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0733%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0219%9 Aug
ancient16–130.0124%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0127%4 Aug
inferno13–30.0525%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0314%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0229%4 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0814%3 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0124%3 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0915%3 Aug
inferno9–130.0019%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0622%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0027%27 Jul
inferno13–20.0324%26 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0228%25 Jul
inferno11–130.019%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0729%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0617%21 Jul
dust213–3-0.0329%21 Jul
ancient9–130.0123%14 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0229%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0622%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0333%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0419%10 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0615%10 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0817%6 Jul
dust213–6-0.0427%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0018%6 Jul
dust213–9-0.0236%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0124%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.026%1 Jul
nuke13–8-0.038%30 Jun
anubis13–90.0430%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0622%30 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0512%30 Jun
inferno13–10.0724%30 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0415%29 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0225%29 Jun
dust25–130.0215%29 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0330%28 Jun
overpass2–130.0210%28 Jun
nuke0–13-0.0920%28 Jun
dust29–130.0211%27 Jun
ancient13–80.0420%24 Jun
dust215–15-0.0317%23 Jun
mirage3–13-0.1029%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.039%22 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0312%22 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0625%21 Jun
cache13–6-0.0328%19 Jun
inferno11–130.0315%19 Jun
dust24–13-0.0523%19 Jun
dust213–10-0.0621%16 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0928%16 Jun
inferno13–40.1526%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0823%15 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0212%14 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0336%14 Jun
inferno13–40.0427%12 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0232%9 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0327%9 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0422%9 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0138%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →