microflakes — CS2 Stats

76561198413101851[U:1:452836123]✓ No bans

3,543Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,931 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning67

Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression9.6

Utility7.4

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning6.7

Utility7.4

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time584ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy21.7%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — sanctum 9–2

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	24	14–10	58%	0.01
dust2	C	20	7–13	35%	0.00
inferno	A	20	12–8	60%	-0.00
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.02
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.04
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.05
sanctum	—	1	1–0	100%	0.22

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,990Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

72.4ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	294	49%	1.01	14.3
Inferno	198	54%	1.16	14.5
Dust2	156	44%	0.99	14.3
Anubis	135	45%	1.00	14.7
Nuke	134	57%	1.18	14.7
Ancient	127	44%	1.01	14.3
Vertigo	116	54%	1.07	13.9
Overpass	44	55%	1.13	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy

39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.8%Spray accuracy

89.2%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

589msReaction time

38.5%T opening success

56.7%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

13.0%Flash assists

7.62HE damage / grenade

16.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.4993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–7	0.04	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	28%	17 Aug →
vertigo	19–16	-0.04	16%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.00	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	29%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	41%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	22%	10 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.01	21%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.05	26%	7 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	29%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	22%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	23%	26 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	27%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.05	9%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–16	0.07	32%	26 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	14%	25 Jun →
sanctum	9–2	0.22	12%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	23%	17 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	25%	17 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.01	24%	4 Jun →
inferno	16–14	0.05	19%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	22%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–3	-0.05	10%	2 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.16	14%	1 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	28%	1 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	23%	1 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	17%	31 May →
inferno	13–7	0.03	20%	31 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	20%	31 May →
nuke	13–6	0.05	20%	31 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	16%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.02	28%	31 May →
mirage	13–10	0.02	15%	30 May →
inferno	13–4	0.07	15%	28 May →
nuke	8–8	0.10	15%	27 May →
cache	13–6	-0.08	26%	22 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	28%	21 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	27%	18 May →
dust2	4–13	0.08	17%	16 May →
mirage	13–9	0.06	21%	15 May →
dust2	10–13	0.02	29%	15 May →
dust2	13–6	0.03	20%	14 May →
nuke	13–10	0.01	20%	12 May →
anubis	5–13	0.02	20%	12 May →
overpass	9–13	0.05	28%	10 May →
overpass	13–7	0.03	21%	5 May →
nuke	8–13	0.01	32%	5 May →
anubis	13–5	0.03	20%	3 May →
cache	6–13	-0.07	25%	3 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	11%	1 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	15%	1 May →
dust2	15–15	0.02	31%	1 May →
inferno	13–3	0.01	21%	30 Apr →
ancient	13–2	0.04	24%	30 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.03	16%	26 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.06	25%	26 Apr →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	14%	26 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	12%	26 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.02	28%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	23%	13 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	23%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.06	17%	13 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	15%	12 Apr →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	27%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.03	15%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.04	11%	12 Apr →
overpass	7–13	-0.01	29%	12 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.03	27%	11 Apr →
dust2	14–16	0.02	23%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	12%	11 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	29%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.02	15%	10 Apr →
overpass	13–6	0.05	15%	10 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	17%	9 Apr →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	16%	9 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.03	27%	7 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	10%	7 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.06	15%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.02	17%	4 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.01	20%	3 Apr →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	19%	2 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	21%	2 Apr →
mirage	16–13	-0.06	13%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.00	29%	28 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	13%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.04	29%	26 Mar →
dust2	16–13	0.03	24%	25 Mar →
inferno	3–9	-0.05	23%	19 Mar →
inferno	1–9	-0.14	67%	19 Mar →
nuke	8–8	0.05	5%	19 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.05	31%	17 Mar →
inferno	9–6	0.04	18%	17 Mar →
anubis	13–9	0.00	18%	13 Mar →