Darkling

Darkling — CS2 Stats

76561198412478924[U:1:452213196]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,528Tracked matches59%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating10,407Blue band · top ~52.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41141 of 57928 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 816 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDarklingFACEITLevel 4 · 816 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,407 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60373Last 10060%Win rateWLWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression4.3
Utility5.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy11.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–2
131Biggest win — inferno
10Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 53% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2516964%0.01
nukeA22121055%0.03
anubisB1910953%0.00
cacheA106460%-0.00
infernoA106460%0.03
dust2S86275%0.02
mirage330100%-0.02
overpass110100%-0.04
train1010%-0.05
vertigo1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
47%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
75.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2352%1.0216.1
Nuke1457%1.0315.6
Inferno1250%0.7413.0
Anubis1050%0.7810.8
Dust2922%0.7511.3
Mirage425%0.559.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.7%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
73.3%Counter-strafing
13.4°Preaim
556msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
14.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.4363° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.6757% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0115%30 Aug
ancient7–130.0212%29 Aug
cache13–40.0610%27 Aug
ancient6–130.0215%25 Aug
nuke13–80.1014%25 Aug
ancient2–13-0.080%25 Aug
cache13–80.037%25 Aug
dust213–70.0514%25 Aug
cache5–13-0.0117%24 Aug
anubis13–40.0013%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.076%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0420%24 Aug
ancient16–140.015%24 Aug
overpass13–2-0.0412%22 Aug
nuke4–130.069%21 Aug
ancient8–130.0214%21 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0018%20 Aug
ancient13–110.0721%20 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0120%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0215%20 Aug
nuke13–30.079%20 Aug
nuke13–11-0.028%20 Aug
dust210–130.0112%20 Aug
nuke16–120.0715%20 Aug
mirage13–50.0215%20 Aug
cache6–13-0.008%19 Aug
anubis13–30.065%19 Aug
nuke3–13-0.055%19 Aug
anubis13–16-0.038%18 Aug
nuke15–150.036%18 Aug
cache13–5-0.0411%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.018%17 Aug
anubis13–90.016%17 Aug
anubis5–13-0.013%17 Aug
ancient13–6-0.015%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.006%15 Aug
nuke13–20.0810%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.037%15 Aug
train4–7-0.0525%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0518%14 Aug
inferno7–130.0411%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0211%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.024%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.017%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0126%7 Aug
anubis13–110.0413%7 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0311%5 Aug
inferno3–130.0622%5 Aug
nuke13–40.1311%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0211%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.064%4 Aug
dust213–70.0111%4 Aug
nuke8–130.015%4 Aug
ancient13–70.0311%4 Aug
inferno12–120.0414%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.004%2 Aug
dust213–100.037%2 Aug
nuke9–130.077%2 Aug
inferno15–150.008%2 Aug
nuke13–110.059%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.045%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0513%1 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0310%1 Aug
anubis10–13-0.069%1 Aug
inferno13–90.0311%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0011%1 Aug
ancient16–130.056%31 Jul
anubis13–50.076%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0413%31 Jul
dust216–130.046%31 Jul
anubis13–7-0.025%31 Jul
cache10–130.0017%31 Jul
nuke13–40.0618%31 Jul
vertigo9–130.0115%31 Jul
nuke10–130.0517%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0521%29 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0516%28 Jul
anubis13–30.0511%28 Jul
nuke13–90.044%28 Jul
ancient13–20.1617%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0112%28 Jul
ancient13–80.065%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.025%27 Jul
dust213–30.0624%27 Jul
inferno13–10.0533%27 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0410%26 Jul
anubis13–20.0213%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0316%24 Jul
cache16–14-0.029%24 Jul
anubis14–16-0.035%24 Jul
anubis12–160.015%23 Jul
inferno13–80.0424%23 Jul
anubis11–13-0.019%22 Jul
ancient13–40.056%22 Jul
cache13–110.0110%22 Jul
anubis13–100.0410%22 Jul
anubis2–130.0110%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.038%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.036%21 Jul
nuke13–110.0011%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →