TrexxzyLuck

TrexxzyLuck — CS2 Stats

US76561198410125770[U:1:449860042]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,173Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,840Purple band · top ~17.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10034 of 18409 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 740 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrexxzyLuckFACEITLevel 4 · 740 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,840 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning59
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51427Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression8.3
Utility7.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch1.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.9
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time624ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — anubis 13–8
130Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC26101638%0.01
anubisC1881044%0.03
cacheB178947%0.01
mirageA117464%0.03
ancientA106460%-0.01
dust2A95456%0.01
nukeS97278%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

185Matches
47%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
97.4ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3152%1.4021.4
Anubis1560%1.4519.9
Ancient1471%1.5720.5
Nuke1457%1.4219.2
Dust21457%1.2220.9
Inferno1421%1.3221.1
Overpass850%1.1516.1
Vertigo757%1.1718.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
618msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.81HE damage / grenade
20.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5487% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0025%28 Aug
cache11–130.0638%28 Aug
dust27–130.0522%27 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0228%27 Aug
cache7–3-0.010%27 Aug
anubis13–80.2320%27 Aug
cache13–40.0430%27 Aug
cache13–00.0128%27 Aug
cache13–90.0632%27 Aug
anubis13–70.1331%27 Aug
anubis8–130.0725%27 Aug
inferno13–80.0240%27 Aug
cache7–130.0033%26 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0214%26 Aug
cache6–130.0630%26 Aug
cache0–13-0.0813%26 Aug
inferno6–130.0148%25 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0936%25 Aug
anubis12–120.0417%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0414%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0331%25 Aug
anubis13–90.1020%25 Aug
nuke13–100.0325%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0231%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0722%25 Aug
inferno0–6-0.080%25 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0229%25 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0130%25 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0527%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0231%24 Aug
ancient12–120.0419%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0625%24 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0529%23 Aug
anubis13–50.0431%23 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0334%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0234%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0119%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0725%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0327%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0941%23 Aug
ancient13–100.0219%23 Aug
inferno13–40.0522%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.0629%22 Aug
inferno12–120.0641%21 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0329%21 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0124%21 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0022%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0627%19 Aug
anubis12–120.0036%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0227%19 Aug
dust213–10-0.0122%19 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0226%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0842%18 Aug
dust23–130.0324%18 Aug
inferno8–130.0626%18 Aug
dust213–6-0.0330%18 Aug
mirage13–10.0822%18 Aug
inferno8–130.0732%18 Aug
inferno9–130.0731%17 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0419%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0137%17 Aug
mirage13–60.1128%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0327%16 Aug
dust28–130.0334%16 Aug
dust213–60.0630%11 Aug
cache13–110.0816%2 Aug
anubis16–120.0527%2 Aug
dust213–50.0220%2 Aug
inferno8–130.0324%2 Aug
nuke16–130.0025%1 Aug
anubis3–130.0533%1 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0028%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.074%1 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0128%31 Jul
dust213–80.0320%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0226%31 Jul
ancient7–130.0012%31 Jul
anubis13–70.0423%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0722%30 Jul
inferno5–20.1336%30 Jul
inferno13–60.0620%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0522%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0320%28 Jul
anubis5–130.0621%28 Jul
cache13–110.0727%28 Jul
cache13–9-0.0219%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.0129%26 Jul
cache12–12-0.0120%26 Jul
mirage4–0-0.0620%26 Jul
mirage13–60.1330%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0221%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0624%29 Apr
mirage13–40.0437%21 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0755%19 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0249%18 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0626%16 Apr
inferno8–130.0430%16 Apr
mirage7–130.0630%16 Apr
inferno9–11-0.0523%11 Apr
mirage7–130.0119%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →