kobes

kobes — CS2 Stats

US76561198403088157[U:1:442822429]Steam profile ↗

2,613Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,728 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkobesFACEITLevel 10 · 1,728 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning51
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateWWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression6.5
Utility4.1
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time596ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 9–13
133Biggest win — mirage
15Longest win streak
W3Current streak
174In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 43% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC35152043%-0.00
infernoS1511473%0.00
ancientB158753%0.01
dust2A148657%-0.03
cacheA138562%-0.00
anubisS75271%0.00
nuke1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,822Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage51051%1.1016.8
Inferno20552%1.0916.4
Ancient17953%0.9915.9
Anubis14251%1.0716.5
Dust212844%0.9616.0
Overpass4060%1.1116.6
Vertigo3842%1.0817.0
Cache3658%1.0415.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
598msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
5.59HE damage / grenade
4.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2832% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0120%25 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0315%24 Aug
cache16–120.0311%20 Aug
dust213–16-0.0526%13 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0120%11 Aug
cache13–11-0.0221%10 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0016%10 Aug
dust211–13-0.0415%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0413%7 Aug
inferno7–130.0019%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0217%4 Aug
anubis19–160.0322%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0229%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0615%1 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0310%31 Jul
ancient13–50.0219%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0930%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0022%31 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0020%31 Jul
cache13–100.0135%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0223%24 Jul
cache4–13-0.0527%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0818%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0825%20 Jul
ancient8–130.039%20 Jul
anubis13–50.0016%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0217%19 Jul
dust213–5-0.0112%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0417%17 Jul
ancient13–11-0.084%15 Jul
cache13–110.0128%14 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0413%13 Jul
dust213–90.0413%13 Jul
mirage13–80.1423%13 Jul
anubis13–50.1017%10 Jul
dust213–40.0115%10 Jul
cache16–14-0.0313%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0415%9 Jul
ancient13–7-0.046%9 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0230%9 Jul
ancient11–130.0221%8 Jul
dust210–13-0.0429%8 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0013%7 Jul
mirage7–130.0121%3 Jul
mirage9–130.0217%2 Jul
inferno8–130.0024%30 Jun
inferno13–40.0314%30 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0421%30 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0124%30 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0329%29 Jun
inferno13–110.0426%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0013%27 Jun
inferno16–130.0311%25 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0230%25 Jun
mirage22–18-0.0120%23 Jun
inferno10–130.0214%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0525%21 Jun
dust213–50.0317%21 Jun
cache16–130.0317%21 Jun
dust23–13-0.070%20 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0415%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.038%19 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0032%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0625%19 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0131%18 Jun
dust213–7-0.0610%18 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0016%17 Jun
cache12–16-0.0211%17 Jun
mirage9–13-0.038%17 Jun
mirage16–120.0115%16 Jun
ancient13–40.0827%16 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0226%16 Jun
dust215–19-0.0432%16 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0414%13 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0821%12 Jun
cache4–130.0312%11 Jun
inferno13–110.0338%11 Jun
mirage19–170.0628%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0420%8 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0219%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0631%6 Jun
mirage8–130.037%6 Jun
mirage13–70.1029%5 Jun
anubis13–100.0313%3 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0339%3 Jun
dust213–100.0329%3 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0421%3 Jun
cache13–5-0.0335%2 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0311%1 Jun
mirage6–130.0013%29 May
cache13–70.0429%29 May
cache4–13-0.0127%29 May
mirage13–6-0.0010%26 May
ancient9–130.1425%26 May
mirage13–110.0118%25 May
mirage14–16-0.0715%24 May
dust23–13-0.0514%24 May
ancient4–130.0312%24 May
ancient9–13-0.0719%24 May
ancient13–80.0621%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →