Sk1mmy

Sk1mmy — CS2 Stats

76561198402381663[U:1:442115935]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

482Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSk1mmyFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning65
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44488Last 10044%Win rateLLTWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression10.0
Utility5.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time583ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC54243044%0.04
cacheD93633%0.02
dust2A95456%0.03
nukeS75271%-0.01
ancientD72529%-0.01
infernoD61517%0.04
anubis42250%0.01
overpass21150%0.02
vertigo1010%0.01
warden110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

103Matches
51%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
87.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%0.9714.8
Dust2757%1.3419.6
Nuke4100%1.6219.0
Ancient333%0.9613.3
Overpass367%1.7421.3
Anubis250%1.3814.0
Inferno250%1.1421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
592msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
67.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
10.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0142% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.1518%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0435%23 Aug
cache15–150.0314%14 Jul
nuke16–140.0217%14 Jul
vertigo2–130.0112%27 Jun
dust28–130.0322%27 Jun
mirage2–130.0413%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0928%27 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0112%20 Jun
mirage16–120.0118%20 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0133%17 May
cache3–13-0.0111%17 May
cache9–130.0021%13 May
cache10–130.0526%13 May
cache13–30.0217%11 May
cache8–130.0212%8 May
cache13–20.0318%8 May
mirage0–13-0.0220%8 May
cache13–20.0219%6 May
cache2–130.0111%29 Apr
mirage12–120.0614%27 Apr
mirage13–80.1222%27 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0216%23 Apr
mirage10–130.0914%21 Apr
nuke16–140.007%18 Apr
dust213–110.0315%18 Apr
mirage13–80.0418%18 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0117%14 Apr
mirage5–130.0618%12 Apr
anubis4–13-0.084%12 Apr
dust26–13-0.0322%11 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0125%11 Apr
mirage13–20.0219%11 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0113%11 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0431%11 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0618%10 Apr
mirage13–110.0722%10 Apr
inferno12–120.078%10 Apr
mirage11–130.0220%10 Apr
mirage7–90.1715%9 Apr
mirage13–70.0824%8 Apr
mirage13–50.0610%8 Apr
mirage13–90.1218%7 Apr
ancient13–11-0.016%6 Apr
mirage13–100.1418%6 Apr
mirage13–60.0318%5 Apr
anubis13–40.0920%5 Apr
warden13–110.0622%5 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0223%5 Apr
mirage12–120.0419%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0816%5 Apr
mirage13–50.2227%5 Apr
mirage13–90.1015%5 Apr
mirage11–130.0127%4 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0523%4 Apr
mirage7–130.0021%3 Apr
mirage10–130.0639%3 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0111%3 Apr
dust213–8-0.0317%3 Apr
mirage13–60.0317%3 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0219%2 Apr
nuke12–120.0313%2 Apr
anubis13–110.0323%2 Apr
mirage13–100.1113%2 Apr
nuke13–90.0122%2 Apr
mirage10–130.0314%2 Apr
mirage16–130.0417%2 Apr
dust213–90.0623%31 Mar
dust211–13-0.0020%31 Mar
mirage13–110.0615%31 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0114%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0322%31 Mar
dust210–130.0722%31 Mar
ancient11–130.0330%31 Mar
inferno13–50.0510%31 Mar
ancient1–80.000%30 Mar
mirage11–130.0713%30 Mar
inferno10–130.1516%30 Mar
mirage13–50.0519%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0612%29 Mar
inferno11–130.0113%29 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0123%29 Mar
inferno10–130.0114%28 Mar
inferno5–13-0.066%28 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0213%28 Mar
mirage8–130.0117%28 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0616%28 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0324%28 Mar
overpass3–130.0310%28 Mar
mirage13–50.1127%27 Mar
nuke13–50.0214%27 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0132%26 Mar
dust213–110.0929%25 Mar
mirage13–50.0925%24 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0113%24 Mar
mirage13–90.0723%24 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0311%24 Mar
overpass13–30.0118%24 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0018%23 Mar
dust213–60.0522%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →