lyvio- — CS2 Stats

76561198390689559[U:1:430423831]

288Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlyvio-FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning42
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression1.4
Utility1.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 3% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.2
Utility1.1
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time603ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — vertigo 13–1
162Biggest win — vertigo
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
58Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 15anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA50292158%0.01
vertigoS1512380%0.06
ancientB115645%0.00
nukeA95456%0.04
anubisD61517%-0.02
dust243175%-0.02
inferno21150%0.02
palais1010%-0.02
overpass110100%0.07
cache110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

765Matches
60%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
78.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12852%1.1516.8
Dust23650%1.0315.7
Anubis3639%0.9916.1
Ancient2931%0.8412.9
Nuke1242%0.9213.8
Inferno743%1.4919.9
Vertigo667%1.3817.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
92.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
603msReaction time
3.2%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 3.2443% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–4-0.0716%26 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0330%24 Jan
palais6–9-0.0233%4 Jan
nuke9–30.2331%4 Jan
anubis10–130.0127%4 Jan
mirage13–70.0621%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0216%6 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0625%9 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0226%7 Mar
mirage0–13-0.1035%7 Mar
mirage13–50.1733%7 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0319%7 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0221%7 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0624%28 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0024%28 Feb
mirage20–22-0.0120%28 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0727%26 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0419%26 Feb
mirage16–120.0223%26 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0917%26 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0627%26 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0014%24 Feb
mirage13–100.0417%24 Feb
ancient6–12-0.1016%22 Feb
mirage13–100.0017%22 Feb
mirage16–130.0620%22 Feb
mirage6–130.0032%20 Feb
mirage13–40.0528%20 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0016%16 Feb
mirage13–40.0419%16 Feb
ancient0–12-0.0550%15 Jan
mirage9–130.1037%15 Jan
overpass13–80.0722%15 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0228%7 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0240%29 Dec
vertigo13–40.0311%29 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0134%29 Dec
nuke13–60.0428%28 Dec
vertigo8–130.0630%28 Dec
nuke13–10.1423%27 Dec
mirage4–130.0150%26 Dec
vertigo13–10.2938%26 Dec
ancient13–70.1833%26 Dec
anubis12–16-0.0222%25 Nov
anubis13–7-0.0217%20 Nov
mirage10–130.0435%5 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0122%5 Nov
mirage16–4-0.0717%3 Sept
vertigo16–70.0120%3 Sept
mirage13–160.0826%2 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0117%27 Aug
ancient16–30.0422%27 Aug
vertigo16–20.1019%26 Aug
mirage6–160.0419%12 Aug
nuke16–110.0317%12 Aug
mirage17–190.0119%12 Aug
vertigo16–11-0.0229%4 Jun
mirage16–90.0126%4 Jun
cache16–60.1222%27 May
anubis5–16-0.0617%29 Apr
mirage16–120.0220%29 Apr
mirage16–90.0714%21 Apr
mirage16–110.0120%15 Apr
vertigo16–40.0916%15 Apr
mirage16–140.0422%15 Apr
mirage7–160.0229%2 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0116%5 Mar
vertigo16–120.0225%26 Feb
inferno16–140.0126%25 Feb
inferno15–190.0323%25 Feb
mirage7–160.0324%21 Feb
vertigo16–30.1020%20 Feb
vertigo16–130.0420%19 Feb
mirage10–16-0.0618%25 Dec
mirage16–11-0.0222%24 Dec
mirage16–110.0614%24 Dec
vertigo13–160.0224%23 Dec
mirage16–30.0412%23 Dec
mirage11–160.0416%27 Nov
mirage16–8-0.0411%27 Nov
dust25–160.0127%27 Nov
vertigo16–70.0932%25 Nov
mirage16–70.0622%5 Mar
nuke7–16-0.0725%4 Mar
mirage16–80.0427%6 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0220%23 Jan
mirage17–190.0225%23 Jan
vertigo16–110.0210%10 Jan
mirage16–14-0.0116%10 Jan
vertigo11–160.018%9 Jan
mirage16–130.0121%9 Jan
dust29–4-0.0218%5 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0115%23 Dec
mirage16–110.0827%23 Dec
ancient16–40.1135%22 Dec
mirage16–90.0521%22 Dec
ancient16–120.0415%12 Dec
nuke16–50.0423%12 Dec
dust216–13-0.0113%12 Dec
vertigo16–40.0124%12 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →