kent

kent — CS2 Stats

US76561198380701987[U:1:420436259]Steam profile ↗

347Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,896Blue band · top ~28.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14364 of 22366 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkentPREMIER14,896 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression5.2
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch6.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time609ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy27.5%+8.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–5
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.00
dust2B1910953%-0.01
cacheB1910953%-0.02
ancientC1761135%-0.03
anubisD62433%0.00
nukeA53260%0.04
inferno42250%-0.00
train1010%-0.05
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.3ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win
41%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2050%0.9813.9
Cache1233%1.0115.6
Ancient956%1.3313.2
Dust2862%0.9014.6
Nuke367%1.1318.0
Anubis367%1.2318.7
Overpass250%0.7517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
87.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
604msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
9.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0217%27 Aug
dust213–110.0323%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.0215%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0418%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0621%18 Aug
mirage10–130.0242%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0334%13 Aug
mirage13–90.0226%13 Aug
mirage13–60.0543%11 Aug
train7–13-0.0539%11 Aug
cache3–13-0.0645%11 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0323%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0037%8 Aug
ancient13–30.0611%8 Aug
anubis10–130.0533%8 Aug
cache13–7-0.0124%8 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0438%8 Aug
ancient13–100.0340%6 Aug
ancient8–130.0223%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0719%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0319%31 Jul
cache13–8-0.0338%31 Jul
mirage4–130.0115%30 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0415%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0817%30 Jul
dust212–12-0.0235%30 Jul
cache4–11-0.0042%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0421%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0446%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0817%28 Jul
ancient13–20.0330%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0531%24 Jul
dust214–16-0.0114%23 Jul
inferno9–60.0419%22 Jul
dust21–13-0.0511%22 Jul
cache13–8-0.0138%22 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0420%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0029%22 Jul
nuke13–50.1325%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0224%22 Jul
mirage13–00.0218%22 Jul
dust21–13-0.0420%22 Jul
dust213–40.0214%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0152%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0321%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.104%21 Jul
dust213–60.0119%20 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0225%20 Jul
cache13–100.0218%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0621%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0521%16 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0227%16 Jul
mirage13–160.0122%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0118%14 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0722%14 Jul
dust23–13-0.099%14 Jul
mirage13–40.0130%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0335%13 Jul
cache13–90.0226%12 Jul
dust25–00.0117%12 Jul
cache15–15-0.0221%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.0315%12 Jul
cache13–50.0642%12 Jul
mirage16–130.0224%12 Jul
nuke13–70.0733%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0324%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.0232%11 Jul
anubis13–110.0333%11 Jul
cache11–130.0121%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0825%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0019%10 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0917%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0315%10 Jul
dust211–130.0331%10 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0914%10 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0421%9 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0027%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.037%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0128%9 Jul
cache13–40.0030%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0020%9 Jul
nuke13–40.0614%8 Jul
dust213–50.0326%8 Jul
mirage13–110.019%8 Jul
dust213–60.0516%8 Jul
anubis13–90.0720%8 Jul
mirage13–9-0.047%8 Jul
cache2–13-0.1218%7 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0117%5 Jul
overpass6–13-0.049%5 Jul
dust26–13-0.036%5 Jul
dust216–14-0.0221%5 Jul
mirage13–30.0414%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0318%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0226%4 Jul
dust213–110.0515%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.059%4 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0224%4 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0026%4 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0714%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →