Perc Nowitzki

Perc Nowitzki — CS2 Stats

US76561198377056155[U:1:416790427]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

829Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,393 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerc NowitzkiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,393 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning37
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateLLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression1.3
Utility2.5
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning3.7
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time652ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–4
132Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.00
ancientC167944%0.03
dust2S1510567%0.03
nukeA148657%0.03
infernoS107370%0.03
anubisC94544%0.02
overpassS65183%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
64%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
76.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage580%1.3017.8
Dust2367%1.0317.3
Inferno250%0.7212.5
Ancient250%0.568.0
Nuke250%1.009.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
645msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
29.0%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
12.51HE damage / grenade
1.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4314 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.6152% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0613%8 May
mirage1–13-0.0918%20 Mar
dust213–11-0.0116%12 Mar
anubis8–13-0.039%7 Mar
overpass13–40.0016%1 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0016%1 Mar
inferno13–30.1021%1 Mar
mirage13–80.0424%1 Mar
dust213–90.0630%1 Mar
ancient13–70.0634%1 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0411%1 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0131%28 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0817%28 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0118%28 Feb
nuke7–130.0423%28 Feb
nuke9–10.1024%27 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0219%27 Feb
mirage8–130.035%27 Feb
dust211–130.0222%25 Feb
inferno13–90.0320%25 Feb
inferno13–20.0313%25 Feb
mirage13–80.0526%25 Feb
ancient13–110.0717%25 Feb
ancient13–30.1230%25 Feb
mirage9–130.0128%24 Feb
ancient10–130.0126%24 Feb
mirage13–80.0317%23 Feb
dust22–13-0.0132%23 Feb
dust213–30.0647%23 Feb
mirage7–130.0112%22 Feb
inferno13–100.0921%22 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0321%22 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0121%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0022%21 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0610%21 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0023%21 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0227%21 Feb
dust216–14-0.0223%21 Feb
nuke13–70.008%21 Feb
mirage5–130.0032%18 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0026%18 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0423%17 Feb
dust213–110.0136%17 Feb
mirage13–90.0518%17 Feb
anubis13–70.1222%17 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0021%17 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0617%14 Feb
dust213–80.0331%14 Feb
nuke13–90.0438%14 Feb
ancient11–130.0235%14 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0120%14 Feb
dust213–100.0335%13 Feb
ancient11–130.0517%13 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0222%13 Feb
dust24–60.0729%13 Feb
ancient9–130.0022%13 Feb
inferno6–130.0521%13 Feb
ancient12–12-0.0130%9 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0324%9 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0230%8 Feb
mirage13–100.0220%8 Feb
dust213–60.0524%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0329%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0326%8 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0119%8 Feb
dust213–70.1222%5 Feb
mirage6–130.0329%4 Feb
anubis9–130.0223%4 Feb
overpass13–40.1522%4 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0318%4 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0314%4 Feb
ancient13–40.1918%3 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0117%3 Feb
overpass11–130.0318%3 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0125%3 Feb
overpass13–100.0112%2 Feb
ancient13–100.0333%2 Feb
inferno13–20.0521%2 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0017%2 Feb
nuke13–80.0616%2 Feb
inferno1–13-0.088%2 Feb
nuke13–80.0616%2 Feb
ancient9–130.0314%2 Feb
anubis13–80.0322%2 Feb
dust29–13-0.016%2 Feb
mirage13–100.0418%1 Feb
dust213–11-0.0414%1 Feb
inferno13–9-0.018%1 Feb
anubis16–140.0820%31 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0420%30 Jan
mirage9–130.0410%28 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0224%28 Jan
dust215–150.0621%27 Jan
inferno13–80.0420%27 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0016%27 Jan
ancient13–100.0910%27 Jan
nuke15–150.0713%27 Jan
nuke6–130.0815%27 Jan
mirage13–90.1114%26 Jan
anubis13–70.069%26 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →