Deems

Deems — CS2 Stats

76561198370513092[U:1:410247364]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

785Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,994Purple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8588 of 19332 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,063 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeemsFACEITLevel 5 · 1,063 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,994 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning55
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression4.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time538ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–9
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%0.00
dust2A1810856%-0.01
nukeC167944%-0.00
anubisC135838%-0.01
cacheB126650%0.01
infernoA116555%-0.02
ancientA85363%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1656%0.9714.8
Inferno1547%0.9615.2
Mirage1443%0.8613.1
Ancient1346%0.8614.0
Dust21242%0.9413.4
Anubis1070%1.3916.3
Overpass367%0.9912.3
Train367%1.3913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
545msReaction time
15.2%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
8.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.1609% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0219%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0222%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0621%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0118%20 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0310%20 Aug
mirage13–90.1016%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0114%20 Aug
dust213–80.0515%19 Aug
dust213–10-0.0412%19 Aug
mirage15–150.0213%18 Aug
cache13–60.029%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0313%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0214%18 Aug
anubis15–15-0.014%18 Aug
inferno16–130.0511%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0510%17 Aug
anubis10–130.0421%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0824%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0421%17 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0219%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0727%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0318%17 Aug
cache13–70.0013%16 Aug
anubis10–130.0818%16 Aug
inferno14–160.0114%16 Aug
mirage5–130.0416%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.056%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0317%16 Aug
cache13–20.0711%16 Aug
cache9–130.0116%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0120%16 Aug
nuke1–130.000%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.0523%16 Aug
anubis11–130.017%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0815%16 Aug
inferno11–130.0117%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0318%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0620%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0111%16 Aug
cache6–130.0211%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0610%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0412%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0614%15 Aug
cache13–20.0510%15 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1020%15 Aug
nuke13–20.0924%14 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0117%14 Aug
dust213–3-0.0442%14 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0215%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0324%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0125%12 Aug
dust23–13-0.0111%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0113%11 Aug
anubis11–130.0015%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0715%11 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0410%11 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0213%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.0320%11 Aug
anubis13–60.0313%10 Aug
nuke13–80.066%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0218%10 Aug
inferno0–9-0.0230%10 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0318%10 Aug
ancient13–30.0514%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0312%10 Aug
nuke13–70.0617%10 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0023%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0123%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0914%9 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0015%9 Aug
cache10–13-0.0225%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0125%9 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0121%8 Aug
mirage15–150.0725%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0417%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0114%8 Aug
anubis16–140.0124%8 Aug
dust213–30.0723%7 Aug
mirage13–100.029%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0417%7 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0221%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0522%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0215%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0523%7 Aug
dust28–130.0118%6 Aug
ancient13–90.0530%6 Aug
dust28–130.0517%6 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1117%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0721%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0214%5 Aug
cache6–13-0.0127%5 Aug
mirage16–130.0318%5 Aug
ancient13–100.0112%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0028%5 Aug
dust213–30.0324%5 Aug
cache16–130.0318%4 Aug
dust216–130.0218%4 Aug
cache13–9-0.0426%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0515%4 Aug
dust213–70.0016%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →