TakenBurls — CS2 Stats

76561198363466190[U:1:403200462]

971Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,229Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4994 of 20508 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTakenBurlsPREMIER23,229 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning48
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression3.9
Utility6.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time569ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — overpass 13–6
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25141156%0.01
mirageA22121055%0.01
infernoB137654%0.03
cacheS128467%0.02
anubisC94544%0.00
ancientB84450%-0.00
nukeB63350%0.03
vertigo21150%0.05
train110100%0.01
warden1010%0.09
overpass110100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
47%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2933%1.1715.1
Mirage771%1.2716.9
Ancient333%0.9016.3
Inferno367%0.697.3
Nuke250%1.1118.0
Train10%0.9314.0
Overpass1100%0.9313.0
Cache1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
552msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
12.43HE damage / grenade
8.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9874% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0613%28 Aug
dust214–160.0116%27 Aug
mirage13–70.0517%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.0119%26 Aug
mirage13–20.0313%25 Aug
mirage13–90.1623%22 Aug
mirage6–2-0.0311%22 Aug
anubis13–110.0721%21 Aug
dust211–130.0121%20 Aug
mirage2–50.0436%20 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0733%20 Aug
inferno9–6-0.028%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0310%20 Aug
cache13–80.0315%20 Aug
inferno13–40.0622%20 Aug
dust214–16-0.0132%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.0222%19 Aug
dust213–10.0229%19 Aug
inferno4–130.0016%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0420%19 Aug
dust213–50.1220%19 Aug
dust27–130.0127%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0114%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.047%13 Aug
nuke13–70.1018%9 Aug
anubis10–13-0.019%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0014%8 Aug
inferno13–40.0520%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0723%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0615%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.027%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0316%2 Aug
cache16–120.0722%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.0915%26 Jul
cache13–110.028%24 Jul
ancient13–50.059%24 Jul
dust216–130.0015%23 Jul
dust29–130.0417%23 Jul
dust213–40.068%23 Jul
mirage16–140.0112%21 Jul
anubis7–130.027%20 Jul
dust215–15-0.0325%20 Jul
cache11–130.0713%20 Jul
train13–50.0110%20 Jul
inferno7–130.1217%20 Jul
inferno13–110.0128%19 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0816%19 Jul
dust213–50.0020%19 Jul
ancient11–130.0111%19 Jul
dust213–70.0214%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0510%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0112%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0316%18 Jul
dust25–0-0.030%18 Jul
ancient11–130.0021%17 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0417%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0313%17 Jul
cache13–50.018%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0518%16 Jul
cache7–130.0419%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0111%16 Jul
dust213–40.1217%15 Jul
nuke6–130.0322%15 Jul
anubis0–3-0.030%14 Jul
dust213–40.1028%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0114%12 Jul
ancient13–110.008%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0825%10 Jul
inferno5–130.0522%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0215%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0934%9 Jul
dust22–13-0.0916%9 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0421%9 Jul
dust213–50.0625%9 Jul
cache13–5-0.0217%8 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0612%8 Jul
vertigo13–30.0112%7 Jul
nuke13–60.0213%6 Jul
inferno7–130.0421%6 Jul
dust213–70.0628%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0212%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0520%5 Jul
warden12–120.0916%5 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0315%5 Jul
anubis13–30.0213%4 Jul
cache13–30.0923%2 Jul
nuke8–130.0225%1 Jul
dust213–110.0120%30 Jun
dust29–13-0.0413%29 Jun
dust213–7-0.0432%29 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0416%29 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0113%28 Jun
overpass13–60.2315%27 Jun
cache4–130.0018%27 Jun
vertigo9–130.0810%18 Jun
mirage13–100.0215%18 Jun
dust24–130.0613%13 Jun
inferno12–120.0615%13 Jun
mirage7–130.0211%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.039%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →