s0ggi

s0ggi — CS2 Stats

US76561198359893999[U:1:399628271]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,358Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,068 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGs0ggiFACEITLevel 10 · 2,068 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning71
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateLLLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning7.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 13–6
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA36231364%0.04
ancientS2315865%0.02
infernoB126650%0.02
anubisC114736%0.00
overpassS65183%0.03
mirage43175%0.04
dust23030%0.02
cache31233%0.03
poseidon21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,205Matches
51%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
92.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15555%1.5421.4
Nuke11961%1.4620.3
Anubis10649%1.3920.1
Vertigo6146%1.4122.0
Mirage3441%1.0817.5
Inferno2934%1.3117.7
Dust22438%1.1118.4
Overpass2255%1.3821.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
571msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
66.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.94HE damage / grenade
7.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2482% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4903% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–9-0.1529%22 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.1429%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0321%12 Jul
ancient13–60.1017%12 Jul
nuke13–30.0810%12 Jul
nuke13–30.0821%5 Jul
nuke13–60.0312%5 Jul
ancient13–160.0015%5 Jul
nuke10–130.009%2 Jul
anubis10–130.0016%2 Jul
anubis26–280.0315%2 Jul
mirage16–120.0111%2 Jul
inferno13–100.0010%2 Jul
dust28–130.0615%2 Jul
dust23–13-0.054%28 Jun
nuke13–30.1714%28 Jun
anubis3–13-0.078%28 Jun
dust210–130.0413%25 Jun
ancient13–70.0213%25 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0312%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0316%25 Jun
ancient8–13-0.029%25 Jun
anubis13–70.0816%24 Jun
nuke2–130.0528%23 Jun
mirage16–130.0215%23 Jun
ancient13–40.0412%23 Jun
inferno13–100.0516%22 Jun
ancient13–160.0722%14 Jun
nuke13–70.0622%14 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0017%14 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0311%14 Jun
overpass11–13-0.068%14 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0213%14 Jun
nuke16–140.0722%14 Jun
nuke13–110.0520%14 Jun
ancient13–70.0612%14 Jun
inferno13–100.018%14 Jun
anubis13–30.0415%14 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0413%14 Jun
overpass13–80.0919%14 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0716%13 Jun
nuke13–70.0212%13 Jun
ancient6–130.0516%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0516%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.057%13 Jun
overpass13–5-0.039%13 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0020%13 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0217%13 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0511%13 Jun
nuke9–130.0323%13 Jun
ancient13–30.0914%13 Jun
overpass13–70.0113%13 Jun
inferno13–110.0514%13 Jun
nuke8–130.0517%13 Jun
nuke13–60.0512%12 Jun
ancient13–10.1819%12 Jun
ancient13–50.0316%5 Jun
nuke15–150.0918%5 Jun
overpass13–50.1024%5 Jun
inferno9–20.2021%1 Jun
poseidon9–20.1919%1 Jun
nuke9–50.0516%1 Jun
nuke13–60.2119%17 May
cache7–130.0224%17 May
mirage13–60.1412%17 May
nuke13–90.0913%10 May
nuke13–11-0.0116%10 May
ancient7–13-0.069%10 May
cache13–80.0627%10 May
inferno13–80.1112%10 May
ancient13–110.0519%9 May
anubis12–160.0115%9 May
ancient13–110.0621%4 May
overpass13–60.089%4 May
nuke8–130.0526%3 May
ancient8–13-0.018%3 May
anubis9–13-0.0310%3 May
nuke13–80.0417%2 May
nuke13–6-0.0210%2 May
nuke11–13-0.0217%2 May
cache7–130.016%2 May
ancient13–80.089%2 May
inferno9–130.0516%2 May
nuke13–20.0214%26 Apr
anubis17–190.0415%26 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0113%26 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0124%26 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0211%26 Apr
nuke13–100.028%26 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0617%26 Apr
nuke13–50.0614%23 Apr
nuke16–120.0012%23 Apr
nuke13–110.0711%23 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0612%23 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0117%23 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0011%22 Apr
nuke13–160.0315%22 Apr
nuke13–50.1216%21 Apr
nuke2–130.048%20 Apr
inferno8–130.019%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →