a0 — CS2 Stats

76561198358595839[U:1:398330111]

2,354Tracked matches32%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning54

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–52–8Last 10040%Win rateLWWWWTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression7.8

Utility3.1

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning5.4

Utility3.1

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time510ms−65ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy35.3%+5.7%

first ⅓ avg 29.6% → last ⅓ avg 35.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–0Biggest win — office

4Longest win streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 41% over 41officeWeakest map · 38% over 50

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	C	50	19–31	38%	-0.00
dust2	C	41	17–24	41%	0.02
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
mirage	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

340Matches

48%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

93.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

38%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	20	65%	1.64	21.4
Mirage	13	46%	1.16	18.1
Inferno	13	54%	1.20	15.6
Ancient	7	71%	1.48	18.0
Anubis	5	20%	1.00	16.8
Nuke	4	75%	2.34	20.3
Cache	1	0%	1.19	19.0
Vertigo	1	100%	1.62	39.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

35.2%Headshot accuracy

33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

509msReaction time

28.6%T opening success

57.9%CT opening success

0.35Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

12.34HE damage / grenade

3.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3485 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.6008% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	3–13	-0.07	57%	27 Aug →
office	13–7	0.04	49%	27 Aug →
office	8–6	0.08	33%	26 Aug →
office	13–11	0.05	36%	26 Aug →
office	13–2	0.05	50%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	32%	18 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.06	16%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.08	32%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	22%	15 Aug →
train	13–10	-0.04	38%	15 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.10	34%	15 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.02	64%	15 Aug →
office	7–13	0.01	50%	14 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.00	39%	14 Aug →
office	12–12	-0.00	58%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	39%	14 Aug →
office	10–13	-0.03	59%	12 Aug →
office	8–13	-0.01	39%	11 Aug →
office	9–13	0.01	47%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.12	22%	10 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.04	25%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	6%	10 Aug →
office	11–13	0.02	22%	9 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.11	16%	6 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.05	24%	6 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.02	58%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	15%	5 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.02	23%	5 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.11	14%	5 Aug →
office	13–10	0.03	31%	3 Aug →
office	1–13	-0.04	33%	3 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	53%	3 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	29%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	31%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	9%	2 Aug →
office	13–8	0.01	30%	2 Aug →
office	13–6	0.07	53%	2 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.07	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.21	44%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	26%	2 Aug →
office	4–13	0.04	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.08	17%	1 Aug →
office	11–13	0.08	48%	1 Aug →
office	13–10	-0.04	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	20%	1 Aug →
office	2–13	-0.03	64%	1 Aug →
office	13–8	0.04	39%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	37%	1 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.03	38%	1 Aug →
office	5–13	0.05	18%	1 Aug →
office	13–6	-0.04	47%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.03	26%	31 Jul →
office	7–13	-0.04	29%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	21%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	14%	31 Jul →
office	2–13	0.02	38%	31 Jul →
office	12–12	0.00	26%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	29%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	33%	30 Jul →
office	5–13	-0.02	35%	30 Jul →
office	13–7	0.07	32%	30 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	20%	30 Jul →
office	12–12	-0.03	18%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	7%	21 Jul →
office	13–9	-0.08	41%	21 Jul →
office	13–9	0.08	44%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	34%	20 Jul →
office	13–4	0.09	49%	20 Jul →
office	13–8	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	9%	17 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.04	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.04	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.05	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	27%	17 Jul →
office	13–11	-0.05	15%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	21%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	45%	16 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	26%	16 Jul →
office	9–13	-0.04	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	2–9	0.01	42%	14 Jul →
office	10–13	-0.06	10%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	28%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	13%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	17%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	23%	13 Jul →
office	13–11	-0.04	54%	12 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	12%	12 Jul →
office	13–0	0.02	33%	12 Jul →
shelter	13–4	0.03	35%	12 Jul →
office	11–13	0.04	29%	11 Jul →
office	6–13	-0.02	69%	10 Jul →
office	13–9	-0.02	54%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	31%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.16	32%	9 Jul →
office	9–13	-0.01	39%	9 Jul →