gregπŸ‘‘

gregπŸ‘‘ β€” CS2 Stats

DE76561198349267402[U:1:389001674]Steam profile β†—βœ“ No bans

503Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,780Blue band Β· top ~34.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16547 of 24813 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 Β· 1,603 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgregπŸ‘‘FACEITLevel 9 Β· 1,603 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER13,780 Β· Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning62
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateTWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate Β· +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler β€” Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3
Aggression6.5
Utility6.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 β€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points β€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T β€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start β€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04βˆ’0.00
first β…“ avg 0.04 β†’ last β…“ avg 0.04
Reaction time571msβˆ’94ms
first β…“ avg 666ms β†’ last β…“ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%βˆ’5.1%
first β…“ avg 27.7% β†’ last β…“ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating β€” mirage 8–0
13–0Biggest win β€” anubis
5Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map Β· 80% over 10dust2Weakest map Β· 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB209–1145%0.04
dust2C208–1240%0.03
anubisB137–654%0.03
cacheB136–746%0.03
ancientB105–550%0.04
infernoS108–280%0.02
nukeB84–450%0.04
overpassβ€”21–150%0.04
trainβ€”21–150%0.02
italyβ€”11–0100%0.02
vertigoβ€”11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

400Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
77.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11654%1.1815.9
Dust29555%1.1215.7
Ancient4356%1.1815.7
Nuke2450%1.1816.0
Inferno2348%1.1216.7
Anubis2148%1.0514.0
Overpass520%1.3717.6
Cache560%1.0717.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API β€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
89.7%Counter-strafing
7.4Β°Preaim
563msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
21.4%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
6.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3868% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy β†’Dust 2 grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0327%24 Aug β†’
anubis13–60.1320%17 Aug β†’
nuke13–60.0138%16 Aug β†’
mirage9–130.1417%16 Aug β†’
mirage4–13-0.0131%13 Aug β†’
dust213–60.0219%13 Aug β†’
ancient13–50.0922%13 Aug β†’
dust28–130.0438%13 Aug β†’
dust213–110.0423%11 Aug β†’
anubis14–16-0.0222%28 Jul β†’
ancient13–100.0918%28 Jul β†’
cache13–90.0322%28 Jul β†’
dust29–13-0.0242%28 Jul β†’
inferno13–8-0.0442%28 Jul β†’
ancient6–130.1118%26 Jul β†’
inferno3–13-0.0535%24 Jul β†’
dust26–130.0224%24 Jul β†’
dust213–90.0424%24 Jul β†’
mirage4–130.0513%22 Jul β†’
ancient14–16-0.0018%20 Jul β†’
ancient12–160.0223%20 Jul β†’
mirage8–13-0.0523%19 Jul β†’
ancient13–80.0311%18 Jul β†’
nuke13–10.1810%18 Jul β†’
anubis13–00.0810%18 Jul β†’
anubis13–10.1922%17 Jul β†’
anubis13–8-0.0216%17 Jul β†’
mirage7–130.0715%16 Jul β†’
dust27–130.0427%15 Jul β†’
dust26–130.1320%14 Jul β†’
anubis10–130.0516%13 Jul β†’
dust26–13-0.0413%13 Jul β†’
dust21–13-0.0727%12 Jul β†’
inferno13–110.0222%10 Jul β†’
mirage13–90.0312%9 Jul β†’
anubis9–13-0.0222%8 Jul β†’
ancient13–11-0.025%8 Jul β†’
mirage9–13-0.0328%8 Jul β†’
mirage13–100.0924%8 Jul β†’
inferno16–120.0425%6 Jul β†’
dust213–90.1121%6 Jul β†’
ancient5–130.0312%6 Jul β†’
nuke13–100.0117%6 Jul β†’
dust25–13-0.0425%6 Jul β†’
mirage5–130.0127%6 Jul β†’
mirage16–120.0820%2 Jul β†’
cache5–130.0137%2 Jul β†’
cache13–100.0821%25 Jun β†’
anubis5–13-0.0727%24 Jun β†’
mirage13–5-0.0120%22 Jun β†’
overpass13–20.0318%22 Jun β†’
inferno13–110.0215%21 Jun β†’
mirage16–14-0.0313%21 Jun β†’
nuke11–130.0125%21 Jun β†’
ancient16–130.0024%21 Jun β†’
cache11–7-0.027%21 Jun β†’
anubis4–130.0222%16 Jun β†’
anubis13–40.0522%16 Jun β†’
anubis13–20.0419%16 Jun β†’
dust24–130.0726%16 Jun β†’
inferno13–50.0712%16 Jun β†’
ancient7–130.0215%14 Jun β†’
mirage0–13-0.0330%14 Jun β†’
mirage13–100.0216%14 Jun β†’
dust213–60.0819%14 Jun β†’
overpass8–130.046%11 Jun β†’
dust26–13-0.0117%10 Jun β†’
italy13–80.0222%7 Jun β†’
cache13–10.1543%7 Jun β†’
inferno8–130.0417%6 Jun β†’
dust24–130.0137%6 Jun β†’
mirage8–00.2318%6 Jun β†’
nuke9–60.0615%4 Jun β†’
mirage13–30.1032%1 Jun β†’
nuke8–130.0622%31 May β†’
dust28–130.0236%31 May β†’
mirage4–130.0824%30 May β†’
inferno5–1-0.0533%30 May β†’
nuke6–13-0.0430%30 May β†’
mirage13–100.0230%27 May β†’
cache13–60.0421%14 May β†’
cache10–13-0.0120%13 May β†’
cache4–130.0432%12 May β†’
cache6–13-0.0618%12 May β†’
vertigo13–30.1424%8 May β†’
train5–13-0.0726%8 May β†’
cache8–130.0634%8 May β†’
train13–60.1135%8 May β†’
cache0–13-0.0640%8 May β†’
cache3–130.0050%5 May β†’
cache13–10.1833%5 May β†’
inferno13–110.1125%25 Apr β†’
anubis4–13-0.0332%25 Apr β†’
mirage11–130.0230%23 Apr β†’
nuke10–13-0.0017%23 Apr β†’
dust213–100.0819%23 Apr β†’
anubis13–8-0.019%22 Apr β†’
dust213–30.0235%10 Apr β†’
inferno13–70.0931%9 Apr β†’
dust213–70.0924%9 Apr β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’