Bling Bling Boy — CS2 Stats

76561198345885615[U:1:385619887]✓ No bans

2,733Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,902Purple band · top ~16.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7283 of 13094 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,283 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBling Bling BoyFACEITLevel 6 · 1,283 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,902 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning56
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47458Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLWTLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression6.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–9
133Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1541127%-0.00
cacheA159660%0.04
ancientS1410471%0.01
infernoA149564%0.01
dust2D1431121%0.02
anubisD102820%0.00
mirageB84450%-0.01
train43175%0.06
vertigo32167%0.01
overpass21150%-0.02
office1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

326Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
80.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5549%0.9315.9
Anubis5254%1.0516.4
Dust24939%0.9214.4
Mirage4455%0.8914.2
Nuke3853%1.1015.8
Inferno3757%0.9715.3
Cache2343%1.0816.4
Overpass1338%1.1119.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
559msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
9.53HE damage / grenade
4.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0411%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0311%27 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0821%27 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0426%27 Aug
dust211–130.0225%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0215%27 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0213%26 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0211%26 Aug
cache10–10.0619%26 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0115%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0319%26 Aug
cache12–120.0718%26 Aug
ancient13–60.0815%26 Aug
anubis13–110.0619%24 Aug
ancient13–90.1615%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.0010%23 Aug
nuke13–30.1117%23 Aug
cache11–130.0310%23 Aug
ancient13–4-0.039%23 Aug
ancient13–60.0229%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0213%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0316%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0125%22 Aug
nuke9–130.0120%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0226%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0513%20 Aug
dust26–130.0217%20 Aug
dust29–10.1421%20 Aug
vertigo13–50.0222%20 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0418%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0113%19 Aug
nuke9–130.0313%19 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0317%18 Aug
cache13–110.0222%18 Aug
office2–13-0.1022%18 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0517%18 Aug
anubis12–12-0.016%18 Aug
nuke1–60.0150%18 Aug
train13–30.1521%17 Aug
dust213–90.1318%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0213%17 Aug
anubis12–120.0714%17 Aug
ancient3–00.0929%17 Aug
inferno13–90.0219%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0210%17 Aug
cache2–130.0313%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0217%17 Aug
dust24–60.0914%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0219%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0822%16 Aug
mirage4–130.0216%16 Aug
train3–130.0315%16 Aug
inferno13–5-0.015%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0012%16 Aug
anubis6–130.0212%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0411%16 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0511%16 Aug
inferno0–6-0.0611%16 Aug
cache8–130.019%16 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0019%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0324%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0122%16 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0412%16 Aug
cache16–120.0317%16 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0412%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0611%15 Aug
inferno12–120.0913%15 Aug
anubis15–19-0.047%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0115%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.046%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0122%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.029%14 Aug
vertigo13–100.066%13 Aug
cache13–70.0117%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0312%13 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0617%13 Aug
cache13–70.0417%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0112%13 Aug
inferno19–160.0312%12 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0511%12 Aug
cache13–60.1210%12 Aug
train8–20.0527%12 Aug
nuke13–60.1018%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0718%12 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0112%12 Aug
dust23–13-0.0212%12 Aug
overpass13–110.0215%12 Aug
train13–60.009%12 Aug
ancient13–100.0711%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0421%12 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0417%11 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0432%11 Aug
cache13–100.0628%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.018%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0316%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0215%11 Aug
inferno13–80.0513%11 Aug
cache10–130.0210%11 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0711%11 Aug
cache13–60.1015%11 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →