BungleBoopy — CS2 Stats

76561198339179177[U:1:378913449]

2,014Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,207 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBungleBoopyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,207 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55414Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression5.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time574ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — mirage 2–0
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
164In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 31anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS31201165%0.03
dust2A2214864%0.01
nukeB115645%0.01
overpassC114736%-0.02
infernoA85363%-0.00
ancientC73443%-0.03
anubisD61517%0.00
train32167%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

471Matches
54%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
77.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13452%1.2117.0
Ancient8353%1.2417.4
Anubis7251%1.0915.9
Inferno5456%1.3618.1
Dust24951%1.0014.4
Vertigo4163%1.3120.5
Nuke3060%1.0515.5
Overpass667%1.5117.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
562msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
4.34HE damage / grenade
9.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0418%18 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0226%18 Jul
nuke10–130.0222%18 Jul
nuke13–70.0522%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0717%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0414%30 May
anubis10–13-0.0722%30 May
ancient13–3-0.0731%30 May
anubis6–13-0.0521%30 May
ancient13–10-0.0218%30 May
nuke13–10-0.0320%9 Feb
dust26–13-0.0318%9 Feb
anubis13–100.0419%9 Feb
nuke13–70.0725%9 Feb
mirage9–130.0720%8 Feb
dust213–80.0334%8 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0217%8 Feb
vertigo13–110.0729%8 Feb
nuke6–130.0320%8 Feb
dust213–10.0624%8 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0122%8 Feb
mirage2–00.3350%8 Feb
mirage13–80.0624%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0622%8 Feb
dust215–15-0.0318%1 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0423%1 Feb
dust213–10-0.0111%1 Feb
inferno9–130.0220%1 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0318%31 Jan
mirage13–80.0235%31 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0226%31 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0217%31 Jan
mirage13–60.0430%31 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0222%31 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0711%29 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0128%29 Jan
mirage13–90.0326%29 Jan
overpass4–130.0119%29 Jan
dust213–40.0018%29 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0117%29 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0523%29 Jan
mirage13–90.0112%29 Jan
overpass10–130.0230%26 Jan
dust213–50.0519%26 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0214%26 Jan
anubis11–130.0124%26 Jan
dust29–13-0.0422%26 Jan
dust213–11-0.0126%26 Jan
anubis15–150.0517%25 Jan
inferno13–50.0654%25 Jan
dust215–150.0421%22 Jan
nuke13–80.0518%22 Jan
anubis15–150.0423%22 Jan
ancient13–16-0.0119%19 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0516%15 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0218%12 Jan
ancient13–80.0322%11 Jan
mirage13–70.1027%11 Jan
mirage9–130.0025%11 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0629%11 Jan
nuke11–13-0.019%10 Jan
inferno13–110.0317%10 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0216%10 Jan
dust213–90.0618%10 Jan
mirage5–130.0320%10 Jan
dust213–10-0.0122%10 Jan
mirage13–70.0421%5 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0513%5 Jan
train13–60.0318%5 Jan
mirage16–14-0.0118%5 Jan
dust216–14-0.0018%5 Jan
dust211–90.0118%5 Jan
mirage13–70.0729%5 Jan
mirage9–130.0216%5 Jan
dust26–13-0.0516%4 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0311%4 Jan
train8–13-0.0724%4 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0831%4 Jan
dust24–13-0.0410%4 Jan
dust213–110.0328%4 Jan
mirage13–40.0027%4 Jan
nuke9–130.0118%4 Jan
mirage1–5-0.0225%4 Jan
dust213–60.0722%4 Jan
overpass2–13-0.0432%4 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0324%4 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0619%20 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0517%20 Dec
mirage13–100.0934%20 Dec
dust29–13-0.0019%20 Dec
mirage6–130.0028%20 Dec
dust213–40.1021%20 Dec
overpass13–110.0220%19 Dec
dust213–110.1015%19 Dec
mirage11–130.1324%19 Dec
overpass13–11-0.0619%19 Dec
overpass13–110.0112%19 Dec
nuke13–110.0418%19 Dec
train16–14-0.0229%19 Dec
overpass13–110.0518%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →