BASH — CS2 Stats

76561198329751388[U:1:369485660]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

501Tracked matches62%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating17,688Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16258 of 31091 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50

Positioning48

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim5.0

Aggression7.1

Utility5.3

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch8.2

Strong T-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0

Positioning4.8

Utility5.3

Mechanics2.6

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time587ms+27ms

first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy11.7%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–1Biggest win — anubis

9Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	44	29–15	66%	0.02
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.01
anubis	S	15	10–5	67%	0.03
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
nuke	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.00
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches

53%Win rate

1.37Avg K/D

93.1ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

61%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	10	60%	1.40	18.9
Mirage	3	100%	1.40	19.7
Anubis	2	0%	1.32	21.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.78	32.0
Cache	1	0%	0.67	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.6%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

61.6%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

586msReaction time

49.9%T opening success

28.5%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

5.99HE damage / grenade

7.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.5864% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 28.4745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	2–13	0.00	14%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.07	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.11	9%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	12%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	9%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	9%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.10	7%	8 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.04	11%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.07	12%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.06	8%	1 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	6%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.15	9%	1 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	11%	1 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.05	3%	30 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	9%	30 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.04	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.11	5%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	17%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	10%	24 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.07	15%	24 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	7%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	7%	23 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	9%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	10%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	9%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.02	7%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.06	13%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	13%	20 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	7%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.03	17%	20 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.02	22%	19 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	5%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	14%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.00	25%	18 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	16%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	9%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	5%	11 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	6%	11 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	4%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	6%	11 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	10%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	14%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	16%	11 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.03	7%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	19%	10 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	5%	7 Jul →
italy	7–13	0.06	8%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	11%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	7%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	7%	5 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.04	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.12	9%	5 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	15%	5 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	11%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	12%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	8%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.07	4%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	14%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.11	10%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	8%	29 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.02	12%	29 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	10%	29 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.00	9%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	14%	27 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	4%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	12%	27 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	18%	27 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	2%	27 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.02	16%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.07	2%	26 Jun →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	10%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.02	16%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.02	5%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.10	14%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	10%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	17%	24 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	6%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.09	11%	24 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.08	6%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.08	8%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.04	14%	23 Jun →
dust2	12–16	0.02	21%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–1	-0.06	4%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.00	18%	23 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.06	21%	22 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	20%	22 Jun →