ozempic hamster — CS2 Stats

76561198325181397[U:1:364915669]

1,219Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,248Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2680 of 13027 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGozempic hamsterPREMIER24,248 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning68
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52426Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression9.5
Utility5.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time644ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — anubis 13–3
130Biggest win — vertigo
6Longest win streak
130In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 20dust2Weakest map · 29% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2471729%0.01
cacheS2016480%0.02
mirageB189950%0.01
ancientA148657%0.01
nukeB84450%0.02
anubisA74357%0.07
infernoC73443%0.01
vertigo21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
75%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.7915.0
Overpass250%0.609.5
Dust22100%1.3915.5
Ancient1100%1.3121.0
Inferno1100%1.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
640msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
63.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.27HE damage / grenade
16.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0323%27 Aug
ancient6–130.0025%27 Aug
anubis13–40.0422%27 Aug
dust25–130.0330%25 Aug
inferno13–30.0623%25 Aug
dust213–70.0931%25 Aug
cache13–90.0022%25 Aug
mirage13–110.1031%25 Aug
ancient12–120.0920%19 Aug
nuke8–130.0331%19 Aug
dust212–120.0434%19 Aug
dust29–130.0621%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0120%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0233%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0524%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0520%11 Aug
cache6–13-0.0024%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.0130%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0915%11 Aug
mirage13–110.0332%10 Aug
anubis9–10.1521%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0342%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0248%31 Jul
dust29–130.0238%31 Jul
ancient8–130.0134%31 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0127%31 Jul
cache13–3-0.0122%31 Jul
dust29–130.0930%30 Jul
ancient4–3-0.1415%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0723%29 Jul
dust216–13-0.0019%29 Jul
anubis13–70.0331%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0134%29 Jul
vertigo13–00.0429%29 Jul
vertigo8–130.0530%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0126%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0320%28 Jul
inferno6–130.0125%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0122%28 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0919%27 Jul
cache13–7-0.0219%27 Jul
mirage13–40.0320%27 Jul
dust213–9-0.0230%27 Jul
nuke13–80.1319%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0113%25 Jul
ancient13–90.0525%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0322%20 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0620%20 Jul
cache13–70.0427%17 Jul
mirage0–13-0.030%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0117%17 Jul
cache16–12-0.0624%17 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0415%17 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0512%17 Jul
cache13–100.0852%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0128%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0623%17 Jul
ancient9–130.0131%17 Jul
dust213–110.0319%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0113%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0315%16 Jul
mirage13–50.1313%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.0613%16 Jul
inferno13–100.0923%16 Jul
dust213–6-0.0427%16 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0110%13 Jul
dust212–12-0.0121%13 Jul
anubis12–120.0110%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0314%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0143%13 Jul
inferno12–120.0311%13 Jul
cache13–110.0418%13 Jul
mirage13–110.0328%13 Jul
ancient13–50.0732%12 Jul
cache12–160.0121%12 Jul
anubis15–150.0621%12 Jul
dust26–130.0424%10 Jul
anubis13–30.2627%10 Jul
nuke13–30.0930%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0718%10 Jul
dust213–80.0321%10 Jul
cache13–50.0536%9 Jul
inferno13–100.0220%9 Jul
cache13–100.1221%9 Jul
mirage10–130.0633%9 Jul
dust210–130.0226%8 Jul
cache13–70.0723%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0321%8 Jul
cache13–100.0217%8 Jul
dust28–13-0.0319%8 Jul
cache13–10.0422%2 Jul
nuke10–130.0319%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0820%27 Jun
ancient13–90.0418%27 Jun
mirage2–130.0321%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0026%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.1011%26 Jun
cache13–7-0.0033%26 Jun
ancient3–20.0920%26 Jun
cache13–80.0736%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →