vorxy

vorxy — CS2 Stats

76561198317425375[U:1:357159647]Steam profile ↗

800Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,158Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14265 of 43554 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,354 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,158Peak Premier on CSDB
1,354Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,354
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 177 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,158
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,842 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvorxyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,354 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,158 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,354csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning47
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLTLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.2
Utility6.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.45Best rating — inferno 9–0
90Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 79% over 14infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B33161748%-0.00
mirageB21111052%-0.00
ancientS1411379%-0.00
nukeB136746%-0.01
infernoD113827%0.01
anubis31233%0.03
overpass31233%0.01
vertigo2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

200Matches
52%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
89.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6455%1.5518.4
Dust24151%1.3217.7
Ancient2162%1.3618.6
Vertigo1765%1.7717.9
Inferno1050%1.2517.9
Nuke956%1.1421.4
Anubis850%1.2217.4
Train30%0.9816.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
593msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
13.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7959% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0126%8 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0620%7 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0121%19 May
dust215–15-0.0527%18 May
nuke11–13-0.0016%21 Mar
anubis13–90.0514%15 Mar
dust213–70.0123%15 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0214%11 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0813%21 Feb
dust213–80.0327%21 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0612%21 Feb
dust213–9-0.0211%15 Feb
vertigo5–130.0611%15 Feb
vertigo12–120.0110%15 Feb
mirage13–60.0913%15 Feb
dust26–130.0412%15 Feb
ancient13–70.0612%15 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0516%14 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0315%14 Feb
dust213–70.0121%14 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0325%13 Feb
dust213–50.0317%13 Feb
dust210–13-0.0212%13 Feb
dust213–100.0422%12 Feb
nuke9–130.0721%12 Feb
dust210–13-0.0312%12 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0620%12 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0819%12 Feb
ancient13–100.028%12 Feb
dust211–130.0622%10 Feb
dust213–60.0716%10 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0115%10 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0519%10 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0316%9 Feb
dust24–13-0.0221%9 Feb
ancient13–60.0919%9 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0328%8 Feb
dust215–150.0011%8 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0315%8 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0338%8 Feb
nuke13–80.0422%8 Feb
dust210–13-0.0324%8 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0325%8 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0413%8 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0213%7 Feb
dust24–13-0.0740%7 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0211%7 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0216%7 Feb
mirage13–80.028%7 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0328%6 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0322%6 Feb
mirage13–100.018%6 Feb
dust25–13-0.0516%6 Feb
dust25–130.0325%6 Feb
inferno9–5-0.0318%6 Feb
inferno9–00.4540%6 Feb
dust28–13-0.0213%6 Feb
dust210–4-0.0018%6 Feb
mirage15–150.0319%6 Feb
dust213–10-0.0015%6 Feb
dust213–110.0226%6 Feb
dust212–12-0.0813%5 Feb
mirage13–50.1126%5 Feb
anubis11–130.0515%5 Feb
mirage13–70.0337%5 Feb
dust213–110.0015%5 Feb
overpass13–70.0415%5 Feb
dust28–13-0.0121%4 Feb
mirage25–230.0713%4 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0115%4 Feb
overpass9–130.0116%3 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0322%2 Feb
dust213–70.0518%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0512%2 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0112%2 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0824%2 Feb
dust213–40.0035%2 Feb
dust22–13-0.0614%1 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0321%1 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0120%1 Feb
dust20–8-0.0324%1 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0219%1 Feb
dust213–110.0425%1 Feb
inferno2–9-0.1543%1 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0215%31 Jan
mirage13–5-0.043%31 Jan
inferno3–90.0138%31 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0418%31 Jan
nuke13–90.0518%31 Jan
inferno6–9-0.0719%31 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0615%30 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0418%30 Jan
dust213–70.1223%30 Jan
ancient13–70.0231%30 Jan
nuke16–130.1314%30 Jan
dust211–13-0.085%29 Jan
ancient13–60.0114%29 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0632%29 Jan
inferno13–80.097%29 Jan
dust213–11-0.0317%29 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →